3D Hot-Melt Printing Near-Infrared Preheating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional 3D melt printing processes face challenges with low productivity and surface quality due to volume heating methods, which result in delayed re-solidification, uneven surfaces, and high energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

The process focuses on pre-heating only the areas of the product that need to be processed using near Infrared (NIR) radiation with a low penetration depth and high power density, above 200 kW/m², and selectively heating above the sintering or melting temperature with NIR radiation, allowing for precise temperature control and reduced thermal load.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If conventional heating methods (volume heating) are used to preheat the worktable or partial product, then the entire material layer can be heated uniformly, but this causes delayed resolidification, reduced productivity, and high energy consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniform heating of material layerVSAvoidprocess productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by transitioning from uniform volume heating to selective surface heating only at the worktable level where material processing occurs. The heating device is positioned to heat only the immediate working area, allowing other areas to remain at lower temperatures, thereby reducing overall energy consumption and improving productivity by enabling faster processing cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The heating process is segmented into two distinct stages: a first heating stage that preheats only the worktable surface to a first temperature, and a second heating stage that heats specific points above the sintering temperature. This segmentation allows the system to minimize energy consumption while maintaining processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Temperature

If conventional heating methods are used for preheating, then the worktable can be heated, but this causes potentially quality-reducing irregularities on the product surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworktable heatingVSAvoidproduct surface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by transitioning from uniform volume heating to selective surface heating only at the worktable level where material processing occurs. The heating device is positioned to heat only the immediate working area, allowing other areas to remain at lower temperatures, thereby reducing overall energy consumption and improving productivity by enabling faster processing cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical/conductive heating systems with a radiation-based heating system. The heating device emits radiation that selectively heats the worktable surface without causing the excessive heat transfer that leads to surface irregularities in conventional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Temperature

If conventional heating methods are used for preheating, then the material layer can be heated, but this results in high energy consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial layer heatingVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by transitioning from uniform volume heating to selective surface heating only at the worktable level where material processing occurs. The heating device is positioned to heat only the immediate working area, allowing other areas to remain at lower temperatures, thereby reducing overall energy consumption and improving productivity by enabling faster processing cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The heating process is segmented into two distinct stages: a first heating stage that preheats only the worktable surface to a first temperature, and a second heating stage that heats specific points above the sintering temperature. This segmentation allows the system to minimize energy consumption while maintaining processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces energy consumption, minimizes unwanted softening of non-sintered material, eliminates the need for extensive cleaning, and enhances the efficiency of reusable materials, while enabling precise control over temperature differences and color design in the final product.

Implementation Method 1

preheating of the existing partial product to a temperature close to the sintering or melting temperature is effected by an additional heating device... using radiation with a relatively shallow penetration depth, namely near-infrared radiation (also known as NIR radiation)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNear-infrared radiation heating: Infrared Radiation

Implementation Method 2

utilizing the absorption-enhancing effect... the heating above the melting temperature of the material is caused by utilizing the absorption-enhancing effect

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption of electromagnetic radiation: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 3

selective local heating of previously applied material layers... typically achieved using a coordinate-controlled laser that moves across the material layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective laser heating: Laser

Implementation Method 4

selectively heating above the sintering or melting temperature... heating above the melting temperature of the material is caused by utilizing the absorption-enhancing effect

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 5

an inkjet printer is used to apply a substance that increases the absorption rate of the most recently applied layer of material in point by point

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption enhancement: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentEP3697596B13D hot-melt printing process and arrangement
Publication Date: 2023.12.27 VALUE & INTPROP MANAGEMENT
  • EP3697596B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3697596B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3697596B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a 3D hot-melt printing process for producing a three-dimensional product (P) substantially from a polymer powder or polymer filaments, the product being built up in layers by application of polymer plies of powder or filament onto a respectively previously produced ply and selective local heating of predetermined points on the ply by means of a sintering or melting temperature of the powder or of the filaments and sintering or melting of the melted points with the underlying layer. The polymer ply which is in each case newly applied and optionally at least one underlying layer is preheated by planar or travelling irradiation of short- or medium-wave IR radiation to a temperature with a predetermined difference for sintering or melting temperature. The preheating of at least the newly applied polymer ply and/or the local heating is carried out by means of the sintering or melting temperature by means of near IR radiation, in particular with a radiation density maximum in the wavelength range between 0.77 and 1.2 pm and with high power density above 200 KW/m2.