Hot-Rolled Steel Sheet Texture Control for Formability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-strength steel sheets exhibit reduced formability and local deformability, limiting their application in vehicle components due to increased strength, and existing methods for improving elongation and local deformability are limited by structural constraints and anisotropy issues.

Innovation Solution

A hot-rolled steel sheet with controlled texture and grain size, specifically by managing pole densities and Lankford values, and incorporating elements like Nb and Ti, to enhance elongation and local deformability while minimizing anisotropy, achieved through a multi-pass hot rolling process and controlled cooling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the strength of a steel sheet is increased to reduce vehicle weight, then the weight reduction goal is achieved, but the formability and local deformability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidformability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by controlling chemical composition parameters (C: 0.15-0.40%, Si: 0.01-2.50%, Mn: 0.50-4.00%, P: 0.015-0.100%, S: 0.005-0.050%, Al: 0.01-2.00%, Ti: 0.001-0.100%, Nb: 0.001-0.100%, V: 0.001-1.000%, B: 0.0005-0.0050%) and processing parameters (hot rolling temperature range, cooling rate, waiting time before cooling) to achieve a balance between strength and formability. The controlled composition and process parameters produce a metallographic structure that simultaneously provides high strength and improved local deformability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite microstructure consisting of multiple phases (ferrite, bainite, and martensite) with specific volume fractions (ferrite: 30-80%, bainite: 10-50%, martensite: 5-20%). This composite structure at the microscale allows the material to exhibit both high strength from the hard martensite phase and good formability from the ductile ferrite and bainite phases, resolving the contradiction between strength and formability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If structure control methods are used to improve elongation and local deformability, then formability is improved, but the metallographic structure formation is greatly affected and limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal deformabilityVSAvoidmetallographic structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent controls the metallographic structure by precisely managing parameters including chemical composition (specific ratios of alloying elements), hot rolling temperature (950-1200°C), rolling reduction rates, and cooling characteristics. These parameter controls guide the formation of a specific multi-phase structure with predetermined volume fractions, achieving both improved local deformability and structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes phase transitions during hot rolling and cooling to achieve the desired metallographic structure. By controlling the temperature profile and cooling rate, the austenite phase transforms into a mixture of ferrite, bainite, and martensite phases with specific volume fractions. This controlled phase transition process enables simultaneous achievement of improved formability and structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

3Strength

If high-strength steel sheets are used for vehicle components, then weight reduction is achieved, but uniform elongation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoiduniform elongation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite microstructure with multiple phases (ferrite, bainite, martensite) where each phase contributes different properties. The soft ferrite phase (30-80% volume fraction) provides ductility and uniform elongation, while the hard martensite phase (5-20% volume fraction) provides strength. The intermediate bainite phase (10-50% volume fraction) bridges the properties of the two extremes, enabling simultaneous achievement of high strength and good uniform elongation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating a multi-phase microstructure where different phases are distributed throughout the material to provide different local properties. The ferrite regions provide local ductility for uniform deformation, while martensite regions provide local strength, creating a material that exhibits both high overall strength and good uniform elongation characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a steel sheet with superior elongation and local deformability, reduced orientation dependence of formability, and improved mechanical properties, suitable for high-strength applications without compromising anisotropy.

Implementation Method 1

cooling after hot rolling is controlled to control a metallographic structure; and a precipitate and a transformation structure are controlled to obtain appropriate fractions of ferrite and bainite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

large reduction is performed in an austenite region in a lowest possible temperature range to transform non-recrystallized austenite into ferrite and thus to facilitate the grain refinement of ferrite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS9267196B2Method of producing a hot rolled steel sheet
Publication Date: 2016.02.23 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
  • US9267196B2 patent drawing
  • US9267196B2 patent drawing
  • US9267196B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a hot-rolled sheet, an average value of pole densities of an orientation group {100}<011> to {223}<110>, which is represented by an arithmetic mean of pole densities of orientations {100}<011>, {116}<110>, {114}<110>, {112}<110>, and {223}<110> in a thickness center portion of a thickness range of ⅝ to ⅜ from a surface of the steel sheet, is 1.0 to 6.5 and a pole density of a crystal orientation {332}<113> is 1.0 to 5.0; and a Lankford value rC in a direction perpendicular to a rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10 and a Lankford value r30 in a direction that forms 30° with respect to the rolling direction is 0.70 to 1.10.