Hot-Stamped Part Heating Profile for Uniform Blank Temperature

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The hot stamping process faces challenges in ensuring uniform heating of blanks with different thicknesses, leading to potential overheating and reduced weldability, corrosion resistance, and increased risk of delayed fracture due to uneven temperature distribution.

Innovation Solution

A method involving step heating and soaking in a heating furnace with multiple temperature sections, where the temperature condition satisfies the equation 0<(Tg−Ti)/Lt<0.025° C./mm, allowing for precise control of heating rates and minimizing temperature differences between adjacent sections, ensuring all blanks reach the target temperature simultaneously.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple blanks with different thicknesses are simultaneously heated in a heating furnace, then productivity is improved, but temperature uniformity deteriorates leading to quality differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating efficiencyVSAvoidtemperature uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The heating furnace is divided into multiple heating zones with different temperature settings. Thinner blanks are placed in zones with lower temperatures while thicker blanks are placed in zones with higher temperatures, allowing each blank to reach the target temperature simultaneously despite thickness differences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the heating furnace are assigned different temperature characteristics to match the specific heating requirements of blanks with varying thicknesses. This localized temperature control ensures uniform heating quality across all blanks processed simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Temperature

If heating temperature is increased to ensure thorough heating, then heating effectiveness is improved, but hydrogen embrittlement increases reducing weldability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating effectivenessVSAvoidweldability
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The heating process uses controlled temperature parameters with a maximum soaking temperature not exceeding 950°C. By optimizing the temperature-time profile rather than simply increasing temperature, the process achieves thorough heating while limiting hydrogen embrittlement and maintaining weldability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Duration of action of moving object

If soaking time is extended to ensure complete heating, then heating completeness is improved, but hydrogen absorption increases reducing corrosion resistance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating completenessVSAvoidcorrosion resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The soaking time is optimized to a specific range of 180-360 seconds at temperatures not exceeding 950°C. This controlled parameter combination ensures complete heating and austenite transformation while minimizing hydrogen absorption, thereby maintaining corrosion resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the uniformity of heating, reducing hydrogen embrittlement, improving corrosion resistance, and maintaining weldability by controlling the soaking time and temperature, resulting in hot-stamped parts with consistent properties and reduced risk of fracture.

Implementation Method 1

inserting a blank into a heating furnace including a plurality of sections with different temperature ranges; step heating the blank in multiple stages

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

heating the blank in a heating furnace with multiple temperature sections

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal convection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

uses a phase transformation of materials and a change in microstructures during the processes; soaking the blank at a temperature of about Ac3 to about 1000° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 4

forming a molded body by hot-stamping the transferred blank; and cooling the formed molded body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS12070785B2Hot-stamped part
Publication Date: 2024.08.27 HYUNDAE STEEL CO LTD
  • US12070785B2 patent drawing
  • US12070785B2 patent drawing
  • US12070785B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hot-stamped part is manufactured from a blank using a manufacturing method that includes inserting a blank into a heating furnace. The heating furnace includes heating sections and soaking sections. The blank passes through the heating sections, and through the soaking sections at a temperature of Ac3 to 1,000° C. In the step of heating the blank, a temperature condition in the heating furnace satisfies formula 0&lt;(Tg−Ti)/Lt&lt;0.025° C./mm, wherein Tg denotes a soaking temperature (° C.), Ti denotes an initial temperature (° C.) of the heating furnace, and Lt denotes a length (mm) of the heating sections. An amount of diffusion hydrogen of the hot-stamped part is less than 0.45 ppm and a corrosion rate of the hot-stamped part measured through a copper potential polarization test is less than or equal to 3×10−6 A.