Hot-Stamped Steel Grain Refinement for Mn Segregation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hot-stamping techniques face challenges in achieving both high strength and toughness in vehicle components due to issues like Mn segregation, coarse carbides, and increased manufacturing costs, particularly in high-strength steel sheets above 2,000 MPa.

Innovation Solution

A hot-stamping process involving a pre-heat treatment to re-dissolve coarse carbides and concentrate Mn at austenite grain boundaries, followed by a thermo-mechanical treatment to diffuse Mn to high-angle grain boundaries, resulting in a microstructure with an average austenite grain size of 5.0 μm or less and reduced Mn concentration at grain boundaries, thereby enhancing toughness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If spheroidizing annealing is performed at lower than Ac3 point to spheroidize carbides, then carbide spheroidization is achieved, but Mn is not sufficiently diffused and coarse carbides are generated, causing toughness deterioration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbide spheroidizationVSAvoidtoughness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by performing spheroidizing annealing at a temperature of Ac1 to Ac1+50°C (just below the Ac3 point) rather than at significantly lower temperatures. This specific temperature range enables sufficient Mn diffusion while achieving carbide spheroidization, and the subsequent rapid cooling at 10°C/s to 500°C/s suppresses carbide coarsening, thereby improving toughness while maintaining carbide spheroidization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic action through a two-stage thermal process: first performing spheroidizing annealing to spheroidize carbides and diffuse Mn, then rapidly cooling to suppress carbide coarsening and transform the microstructure. This periodic heating and cooling sequence achieves both carbide spheroidization and fine microstructure, preventing toughness deterioration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Strength

If high strength steel sheet is used to increase load bearing capacity, then strength is improved, but formability into complex shapes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload bearing capacityVSAvoidformability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes phase transitions by heating the steel sheet to the austenite region where the steel softens, improving formability for complex shapes. After forming, rapid cooling transforms the austenite into martensite, achieving high strength. This phase transition approach allows the steel to exhibit good formability during processing and high strength in the final product

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by controlling the heating temperature to the austenite region (above Ac3 point) during forming to soften the steel and improve formability, then rapidly cooling at 10°C/s to 500°C/s to transform the microstructure and achieve high strength. This dynamic parameter control enables both good formability and high strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If high strength steel sheet is used to increase load bearing capacity, then strength is improved, but toughness decreases and cracks are likely to occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload bearing capacityVSAvoidtoughness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by performing spheroidizing annealing at Ac1 to Ac1+50°C to spheroidize carbides and reduce stress concentration points, followed by rapid cooling at 10°C/s to 500°C/s to create a fine microstructure with small prior austenite grain size. These parameter changes simultaneously improve toughness while maintaining high strength, preventing crack occurrence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating a uniform distribution of fine carbides throughout the microstructure through spheroidizing annealing and rapid cooling. This uniform local structure eliminates coarse carbide aggregates that would act as crack initiation sites, thereby improving toughness while maintaining high strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If Mn concentration is increased to improve hardenability, then hardenability is improved, but Mn segregation occurs causing toughness deterioration

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovehardenabilityVSAvoidtoughness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic action by first performing spheroidizing annealing at Ac1 to Ac1+50°C to uniformly diffuse Mn throughout the steel, then rapidly cooling to lock in this uniform distribution. This periodic thermal treatment prevents Mn segregation while maintaining high hardenability, thereby improving toughness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by performing spheroidizing annealing at a specific temperature range (Ac1 to Ac1+50°C) that enables sufficient Mn diffusion without excessive segregation, followed by rapid cooling to preserve this uniform distribution. This controlled parameter change achieves both high hardenability and uniform Mn distribution, preventing toughness deterioration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves a hot-stamping formed body with excellent strength and toughness by suppressing crack occurrence and propagation, improving the overall mechanical properties of high-strength steel components.

Implementation Method 1

a pre-heat treatment to re-dissolve coarse carbides and concentrate Mn at austenite grain boundaries

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

followed by a thermo-mechanical treatment to diffuse Mn to high-angle grain boundaries

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 3

A hot-stamping process involving a pre-heat treatment... followed by a thermo-mechanical treatment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat treatment: Heat Treatment

Data Source

PatentUS12180573B2Hot-stamping formed body
Publication Date: 2024.12.31 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
  • US12180573B2 patent drawing
  • US12180573B2 patent drawing
  • US12180573B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hot-stamping formed body has a predetermined chemical composition, in which an average grain size of prior austenite grains in a microstructure is 5.0 μm or less, and an average Mn concentration at grain boundaries of the prior austenite grains is 1.0 mass % or less. The hot-stamping formed body may be provided with a plating layer on the surface thereof, or may have a softened region in a portion thereof.