Hot-Stamped Steel Microstructure for Strength-Bendability Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hot-stamping technologies face challenges in achieving high strength and sufficient bendability due to the suppressive effects of chromium on auto-tempering and carbide dissolution, leading to inadequate toughness and ductility in formed steel components.

Innovation Solution

A hot-stamping formed body with a specific chemical composition, including reduced manganese content, optimized chromium levels, and the inclusion of molybdenum and cobalt to enhance hardenability and auto-tempering, along with controlled cooling rates to promote martensite tempering and improve microstructural properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If chromium content is increased to improve hardenability and strength, then tensile strength is improved, but auto-tempering is suppressed and carbide dissolution is delayed, deteriorating bendability and toughness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidbendability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the chromium content within a specific range (0.8-2.0 mass%) rather than increasing it without limit. This parameter optimization balances the competing requirements of hardenability (needing sufficient Cr) and auto-tempering promotion (requiring limited Cr), resolving the contradiction between strength and bendability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite microstructure consisting of martensite and finely dispersed carbides through controlled composition and processing. This composite structure at the microscale provides both the strength from martensite and the ductility from fine carbide distribution, resolving the macroscopic contradiction between strength and bendability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If chromium is added as a carbide stabilizing element to improve hardenability, then strength is improved, but carbide dissolution is delayed during heating, deteriorating bendability

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovehardenabilityVSAvoidbendability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent carefully controls the chromium content within 0.8-2.0 mass% to balance carbide stabilization (for hardenability) and carbide dissolution (for bendability). This optimized parameter range ensures sufficient hardenability while allowing adequate carbide dissolution during hot stamping heating

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves uniform carbide distribution throughout the material through controlled composition and processing. This local uniformity ensures that carbides are finely dispersed rather than aggregated, providing consistent hardenability and bendability throughout the formed body

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If manganese content is reduced to improve bendability, then microsegregation is reduced and crack origins are reduced, but hardenability is lowered

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebendabilityVSAvoidhardenability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces manganese content to less than 0.50 mass% to minimize microsegregation and improve bendability, while compensating for the resulting hardenability loss through optimized chromium content and controlled carbon equivalent. This parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction by finding the optimal Mn level that provides sufficient bendability while maintaining adequate hardenability through other alloying elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses chromium as an intermediary element to compensate for reduced manganese. By optimizing Cr content, the patent maintains hardenability even with lower Mn, thus resolving the contradiction between bendability (improved by low Mn) and hardenability (maintained by optimized Cr)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a hot-stamping formed body with enhanced strength and bendability, characterized by a high proportion of auto-tempered martensite grains and refined carbides, effectively addressing the limitations of previous technologies.

Implementation Method 1

a martensitic transformation start temperature (Ms point) of 415°C or higher

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMartensitic transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

thereafter setting an average cooling rate at a temperature lower the Ms point is 0.1 to 300 °C/s to obtain a metallographic structure in which carbides are finely dispersed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAuto-tempering: Heat Treatment

Data Source

PatentEP3943622B1Hot-stamping formed body
Publication Date: 2024.05.29 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
  • EP3943622B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3943622B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3943622B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A hot-stamping formed body has a predetermined chemical composition and a microstructure including, by area ratio, 90% to 100% of martensite and 0% to 10% of a remainder in the microstructure. In the microstructure, a region in which an average GAIQ value in a unit grain is 60,000 or more is 30 area% or more, and a number density of carbides having a circle equivalent diameter of 0.20 µm or more is 50 /mm2 or less.