Hot Stamping Component Timing Control for Consistent Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing hot stamping processes face challenges in consistently producing high-quality components due to variations in heating time, air cooling time, and mold cooling time, which are not adequately controlled by current methods.

Innovation Solution

A method for manufacturing hot stamping components that involves controlling the heating time, air cooling time, and mold cooling time using specific equations and parameters such as material thickness, heating temperature, and pressing force, to optimize the hot stamping process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional hot stamping processes are used without precise control of heating and cooling times, then the manufacturing process is simple and fast, but the quality of hot stamping components is inconsistent and tensile strength is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of hot stamping componentVSAvoidcomplexity of process control
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by establishing specific mathematical relationships between heating time (λn), air cooling time (λt), and mold cooling time (λq) based on material thickness, heating temperature, and other parameters. These equations provide precise control parameters that transform the quality of hot stamping components, achieving tensile strength of 1350 MPa or more while maintaining manageable process complexity through formula-based control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If heating time and cooling time are extended to improve component quality, then tensile strength increases, but production efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strength of componentVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the balance between strength and productivity by establishing specific time parameter equations. The heating time λn=(an×Tn+bn)×tcn, air cooling time λt=(at×Tt+bt)×tct, and mold cooling time λq=(aq×P+bq)×tcq are calculated based on material thickness, temperature, and pressing force, ensuring the shortest effective processing time to achieve 1350 MPa tensile strength without excessive production time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the process parameters adaptive rather than fixed. The heating and cooling times dynamically adjust based on material thickness (t), heating temperature (Tn, Tt), and pressing force (P), allowing the process to optimize for each specific component geometry and material specification, thereby achieving high strength without unnecessary time extensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If precise control of heating and cooling parameters is implemented, then quality consistency improves, but process design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality consistency of componentVSAvoidcomplexity of process design
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by providing explicit mathematical formulas that directly calculate optimal process parameters. The equations λn=(an×Tn+bn)×tcn, λt=(at×Tt+bt)×tct, and λq=(aq×P+bq)×tcq transform complex quality control requirements into straightforward parameter calculations based on measurable inputs (material thickness, temperature, pressing force), achieving quality consistency without excessive design complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method improves the quality of hot stamping components by ensuring consistent process conditions, leading to enhanced tensile strength and reduced defects, while also facilitating flexible process design and quality control.

Implementation Method 1

heating the blank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

utilize a phase transformation and microstructure change of a material during the process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 3

the heated blank may be air-cooled at room temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir cooling: Convection

Implementation Method 4

a cooling process is a process of cooling a hot-stamped molded body in a mold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS12285794B2Hot stamping component and method of manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2025.04.29 HYUNDAE STEEL CO LTD
  • US12285794B2 patent drawing
  • US12285794B2 patent drawing
  • US12285794B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a method of manufacturing a hot stamping component, the method includes inserting a blank into a heating furnace, heating the blank, and transferring the heated blank from the heating furnace to a mold, wherein an air cooling time of the blank in the transferring of the blank satisfies Equation 1.