Hot Strip Mill Temperature Control Using Predictive Setpoints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current control systems for hot strip mills struggle to optimize setpoint specifications across various units, leading to suboptimal material quality and increased energy and manufacturing costs, especially when producing steel strips with high demands on material quality, due to complex interactions between time, temperature, and structure development.

Innovation Solution

A higher-level process model on a data processing system optimizes setpoint specifications for individual units by exchanging and storing target and actual values, including temperatures, speeds, and cooling/heating rates, using optimization algorithms and subordinate process models to maintain setpoint specifications and improve product properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If individual unit control systems are used with aggregate-specific process models, then unit-specific process control is simplified, but interactions between units are not reflected leading to suboptimal overall process control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunit-specific process controlVSAvoidoverall process optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges individual unit control systems into a centralized control system that manages the entire hot strip mill process. This centralized system integrates process models for multiple units (furnace, rolling stands, cooling section) and optimizes setpoints across all units simultaneously, ensuring that interactions between units are properly accounted for while maintaining comprehensive process control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized control system performs multiple functions: it manages individual unit operations, optimizes overall process parameters, predicts steel strip temperature across different locations and times, and adjusts setpoints for multiple units based on global process objectives. This multi-functional approach resolves the contradiction by providing both unit-specific control capability and overall process optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If static target values are used for control, then control system complexity is reduced, but dynamic optimization of product properties and energy consumption is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidenergy efficiency and production optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic setpoint adjustment where target values for furnace temperature, rolling stand parameters, and cooling rates are continuously optimized based on real-time process conditions. The system uses process models to predict future steel strip temperature and microstructure development, then dynamically adjusts setpoints to achieve optimal product properties while minimizing energy consumption, rather than relying on fixed static targets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs preliminary calculations using process models to predict the future state of the steel strip (temperature, microstructure) before actual processing occurs. This allows the system to pre-optimize setpoints for upcoming operations, enabling dynamic optimization without requiring complex real-time adjustments during critical processing phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If empirical knowledge and previous process analyses are used to define target values, then control implementation is simplified, but complex interactions between time, temperature, and microstructure development cannot be optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol implementationVSAvoidproduct quality for high material quality requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where actual process measurements (temperature, speed) are continuously compared with predicted values from process models. This feedback loop allows the system to validate and refine its process models, ensuring they accurately represent the complex interactions between time, temperature, and microstructure development. The system uses this feedback to continuously optimize setpoints while maintaining reliable product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from using fixed empirical target values to dynamically changing parameters based on process conditions. Process models calculate optimal temperature profiles, heating rates, and cooling rates that account for complex interactions between parameters. This allows the system to maintain simplified control implementation while achieving reliable optimization of product properties through adaptive parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4146414B1Method for the open-loop or closed-loop control of the temperature of a steel strip during hot working in a hot strip mill
Publication Date: 2024.03.13 SMS GROUP GMBH
  • EP4146414B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4146414B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

the invention relates to a method for the open-loop or closed-loop control of the temperature of a steel strip during hot working in a hot strip mill. A higher-level open-loop or closed-loop control involves a process model which predicts the temperature development of the hot strip. The target values of the individual units are adjusted on the basis of this predicted temperature development.