Hot Swap Controller Dual Current Limiting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hot swap controllers underutilize the safe operating area of power MOSFETs by employing a constant power foldback scheme, which does not account for the varying safe operating conditions based on voltage, current, and time, leading to inefficient power management during component swapping in electronic systems.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a hot swap controller with dual current limiting capabilities, where the current through a power transistor is limited to a higher value when the drain-to-source voltage is below a threshold and to a lower value when it exceeds the threshold, thereby optimizing the safe operating area and eliminating the need for a Gilbert multiplier.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a constant power foldback scheme is used to limit inrush current, then the transistor is protected from overcurrent damage, but the safe operating area of the transistor is underutilized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor protectionVSAvoidsafe operating area utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic current limiting by switching between a first current limit (higher value) and a second current limit (lower value) based on the real-time voltage across the transistor. When voltage exceeds a threshold, the controller transitions to the lower current limit, and when voltage drops below the threshold, it transitions to the higher current limit. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to fully utilize the transistor's safe operating area while maintaining protection, resolving the contradiction between reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If a single current limit is used, then the circuit design is simplified, but the efficient utilization of safe operating area during varying voltage conditions is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent control circuitVSAvoidpower management efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the current limit parameter dynamically based on voltage conditions. The controller monitors the voltage across the transistor and adjusts the current limit accordingly - using a first current limit value when voltage is below a threshold and a second current limit value when voltage exceeds the threshold. This parameter adaptation enables efficient power management during hot swapping operations while maintaining manageable circuit complexity through systematic control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional constant power foldback is implemented, then inrush current is limited, but power management efficiency during hot swapping is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinrush currentVSAvoidpower management efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the static constant power foldback approach with a dynamic current limiting scheme that adapts to real-time voltage conditions. By monitoring voltage across the transistor and switching between two current limit levels, the system efficiently manages power during hot swapping operations. This dynamic approach maintains inrush current limitation while significantly improving power management efficiency by allowing higher current flow when voltage conditions permit, thus resolving the contradiction between harmful factor control and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach maximizes the utilization of the power transistor's safe operating area, ensuring safe operation and efficient power management during hot swapping by adapting current limits based on voltage conditions, thus preventing damage from overcurrent or excessive power dissipation.

Implementation Method 1

The comparator is configured to compare voltage across the transistor to a predetermined threshold voltage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVoltage comparison: Ohm's Law

Implementation Method 2

The current control circuitry is configured to limit current through the transistor to no higher than a first predetermined current based on the voltage across the transistor being less than the predetermined threshold voltage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCurrent limiting: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS10873327B2Hot swap controller with multiple current limits
Publication Date: 2020.12.22 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US10873327B2 patent drawing
  • US10873327B2 patent drawing
  • US10873327B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hot swap controller circuit includes a comparator and current control circuitry. The comparator is configured to compare voltage across a power transistor controlled by the hot swap controller circuit to a predetermined threshold voltage. The current control circuitry is coupled to the comparator. The current control circuitry is configured to limit current through the power transistor to no higher than a predetermined high current based on the voltage across the transistor being less than the predetermined threshold voltage. The current control circuitry is also configured to limit the current through the transistor to be no higher than a predetermined low current based on the voltage across the transistor being greater than the predetermined threshold voltage. The predetermined high current is greater than the predetermined low current.