Turbine Engine Housing Bonding With External Flange Shaping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing manufacturing processes for aircraft turbomachine casings, particularly those made of composite materials, suffer from deformation issues during machining and bonding operations, leading to deviations from the nominal geometry, especially in the annular flanges, which are not adequately addressed by current methods.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of shaping tools positioned outside the casing to apply support forces in opposite axial directions on the flanges during bonding, combined with heating and pressurization, to elastically deform and correct deformations, using compact tooling that does not interfere with the bonding process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If composite material manufacturing process is used, then mass is reduced and mechanical resistance is improved, but deformation occurs during extraction and machining

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehousing massVSAvoidflange geometry precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-deforming the flanges during the bonding process using shaping tools. The flanges are elastically deformed in advance to compensate for the deformation that will occur during extraction and machining, ensuring the final geometry matches the nominal dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary anti-action by applying opposing forces through shaping tools during bonding to counteract the residual stresses that will cause deformation later. The tools exert forces in opposite axial directions to prevent the flange deformation that would otherwise occur during extraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Ease of manufacture

If shaping tools are positioned outside the casing, then interference with bonding process is avoided, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding process simplicityVSAvoidtooling arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dimensionality change by positioning the shaping tools in the radial direction outside the casing, rather than inside. This spatial arrangement allows the tools to apply axial forces on the flanges without interfering with the bonding process, effectively using a different dimension to resolve the conflict.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If flange deformation is not compensated, then manufacturing process is simpler, but machining precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing cycle timeVSAvoidflange dimensional accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs the correction action during the bonding process itself, rather than requiring separate post-processing steps. The shaping tools are applied during bonding to pre-deform the flanges, combining the correction with the manufacturing process to maintain productivity while improving precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method effectively prevents flange deformation during bonding, simplifies manufacturing, reduces the need for custom machining, and enhances mechanical and aerodynamic performance by maintaining the flanges' nominal geometry.

Implementation Method 1

exert support forces in opposite axial directions on these flanges so as to elastically deform at least one of the flanges so that the resulting displacements compensate for the deformations that will occur during step b) of bonding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a step b) of bonding the layer to the first surface, during which the casing is heated and compressed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

a step b) of bonding the layer to the first surface, during which the casing is heated and compressed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP3990755B1Method for manufacturing a housing for a turbine engine and tools for the implementation thereof
Publication Date: 2025.11.12 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • EP3990755B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3990755B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4b
  • EP3990755B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

Method for manufacturing a housing (3) for an aircraft turbine engine, said housing comprising: • - an annular body (30) extending around an axis A and comprising a securing flange (31, 32) extending radially outwards at each of the axial ends thereof, and • - an abradable layer (4) arranged inside the body (30), the method comprising a step b) of bonding the layer (4) to the first surface (36), during which step the housing is heated and compressed by means of a system (19) present at least partially inside the housing (3); the method comprises, prior to step b), a step a) of mounting at least two tools (10) between the flanges (31, 32), each of the tools being located in a circumferential area (Z) outside the body (30) so as to exert bearing forces in opposite axial directions on said flanges (31, 32).