Hovering Keyboard Hand Detection for User Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional Information Handling Systems (IHSs) lack effective user identification methods, particularly in scenarios where physical contact with a keyboard is not feasible, such as in hovering keystroke detection, which complicates user authentication and preference management.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a hovering keyboard with proximity sensors that detect hand presence and fit proximity data to a geometric model to identify users, allowing for user authentication and dynamic keyboard layout adjustments based on user identification, including lighting keys corresponding to hand position and distance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If proximity sensors are used to detect hovering keystrokes without physical contact, then ease of operation is improved, but user identification capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehovering keystroke detectionVSAvoiduser identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The hand is segmented into multiple detection zones corresponding to different keys, with each zone monitored by proximity sensors. This segmentation allows the system to identify which specific keys are being hovered over and to distinguish between different users based on hand position patterns, thereby maintaining user identification capability while enabling contactless operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A geometric model of the hand is introduced as an intermediary between the raw proximity sensor data and user identification. The model fits detected hand positions to expected hand geometries, enabling accurate user identification even without physical contact by comparing the fitted model parameters against stored user profiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If proximity sensors detect hand position to enable hovering keystrokes, then device complexity increases, but user identification capability improves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehand position detectionVSAvoidkeyboard system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The proximity sensors serve multiple functions: detecting hovering keystrokes, determining hand position, and enabling user identification. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components for each function, thereby managing device complexity while achieving precise hand position detection and user identification capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the hand's own geometric characteristics and natural positioning over the keyboard to perform identification, rather than requiring separate biometric sensors. The hand itself provides the identification data through its position and shape when hovering over keys, eliminating the need for additional complex authentication hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If geometric modeling is applied to fit proximity data to hand models, then user identification accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser identification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Geometric models of hands are pre-computed and stored for multiple users before actual authentication. During identification, the system only needs to fit the sensor data to these pre-prepared models rather than creating models from scratch, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining high identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system fits only the essential geometric parameters of the hand model (such as finger positions and lengths) rather than attempting to model every detail of the hand. This partial modeling approach achieves sufficient accuracy for user identification while minimizing the computational complexity and processing time required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables secure user identification and dynamic keyboard configuration, distinguishing between users such as children and adults, and enforcing parental controls or security measures based on detected hand characteristics without requiring physical contact.

Implementation Method 1

proximity sensors disposed on a hovering keyboard coupled to the IHS

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectProximity sensing: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS10719137B1User identification via hand detection using a hovering keyboard
Publication Date: 2020.07.21 DELL PROD LP
  • US10719137B1 patent drawing
  • US10719137B1 patent drawing
  • US10719137B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for identifying users via hand detection using a hovering keyboard are described. In some embodiments, an Information Handling System (IHS) may include a processor, and a memory coupled to the processor, the memory having program instructions stored thereon that, upon execution by the processor, cause the IHS to: detect a hand using proximity sensors disposed on a hovering keyboard coupled to the IHS; and identify a user based on the detection.