HP Turbine Vane Airfoil Profile for Flow Separation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current gas turbine engine airfoil designs face challenges in achieving optimal thermal and mechanical performance due to flow separation, leading to reduced thrust and power capability, particularly in high-pressure turbines where harsh temperatures and pressures necessitate a balance between aerodynamic and structural optimization.

Innovation Solution

A novel airfoil profile for the second stage high-pressure turbine vane is defined using Cartesian coordinate values, specifically tailored to meet design criteria by extending between platforms with a fillet radius, ensuring smooth connection and tolerance within manufacturing limits, as outlined in Tables 1 and 2.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional airfoil designs are used in high-pressure turbines, then structural strength is maintained, but aerodynamic performance deteriorates due to flow separation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic performanceVSAvoidflow separation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different geometric characteristics to different regions of the airfoil. The leading edge portion has a specific curvature radius (0.005-0.02 times the airfoil chord length) optimized for flow attachment, while the trailing edge has different dimensional ratios. This local optimization prevents flow separation in critical regions while maintaining overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention defines specific parameter ranges for airfoil geometry including the leading edge curvature radius (0.005-0.02 chord length), trailing edge dimensions, and overall airfoil shape parameters. By optimizing these parameters within defined ranges, the design achieves improved aerodynamic performance while preventing flow separation in the harsh high-pressure turbine environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Power

If airfoil geometry is optimized for aerodynamic performance, then thrust and power capability improve, but structural integrity may be compromised under harsh temperatures and pressures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust and power capabilityVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes different portions of the airfoil with specific geometric characteristics tailored to their functional requirements. The leading edge portion uses a curvature radius of 0.005-0.02 times the chord length for aerodynamic efficiency, while maintaining adequate thickness and structural dimensions in load-bearing regions. This localized optimization allows high power capability without compromising structural integrity under thermal and pressure loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs specific curvature characteristics, particularly at the leading edge with a radius of 0.005-0.02 chord length, and smooth transitions throughout the airfoil geometry. These curved surfaces optimize flow attachment and reduce stress concentrations, simultaneously improving thrust capability and structural durability in the high-pressure turbine environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Productivity

If complex airfoil profiles are designed to meet multiple design criteria, then overall engine efficiency improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine efficiencyVSAvoidairfoil profile complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent defines specific geometric characteristics for different portions of the airfoil (leading edge with 0.005-0.02 chord length radius, intermediate sections, trailing edge) rather than using a fully complex three-dimensional surface. This segmented approach with localized optimizations achieves high engine efficiency while maintaining manufacturability through clearly defined geometric parameters for each section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8662837B2HP turbine vane airfoil profile
Publication Date: 2014.03.04 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP
  • US8662837B2 patent drawing
  • US8662837B2 patent drawing
  • US8662837B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A two-stage high pressure turbine includes a second stage vane having an airfoil with a profile substantially in accordance with at least an intermediate portion of the Cartesian coordinate values of X, Y and Z set forth in Table 2. The X and Y values are distances, which when smoothly connected by an appropriate continuing curve, define airfoil profile sections at each distance Z. The profile sections at each distance Z are joined smoothly to one another to form a complete airfoil shape.