Human Resource Evaluation System Using Bayesian Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Evaluating human resources in a software development environment is complex due to varying expertise and experience levels, making it challenging to assess developers and testers fairly on the same scale, as existing methods fail to consider individual differences in expectations and parameters.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing a processor and memory with modules for receiving, extracting, classifying, and assigning grades to human resources based on historical performance and profile data, employing a Bayesian classification technique to categorize attributes and assign grades, ensuring fair evaluation by differentiating between various roles and expectations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If human resources are evaluated on the same scale regardless of experience level, then evaluation process is simplified, but evaluation accuracy and fairness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation process complexityVSAvoidevaluation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the evaluation process by creating multiple scales based on experience levels (e.g., junior, mid-level, senior developers). Each scale is tailored to the specific expectations and capabilities of that level, allowing for more accurate assessment while maintaining manageable complexity through structured classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the evaluation parameters dynamically based on the human resource's experience level. Different weights, criteria, and thresholds are applied to attributes such as code quality, defect detection, and productivity depending on whether the employee is junior, mid-level, or senior, thereby improving measurement precision without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple factors are considered in evaluation, then evaluation comprehensiveness is improved, but evaluation process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation comprehensivenessVSAvoidevaluation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments multiple evaluation factors into organized categories and attributes (e.g., technical skills, productivity, quality metrics) that can be systematically assessed. This segmentation allows comprehensive evaluation while maintaining process manageability through structured data collection and analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an automated evaluation system that acts as an intermediary between multiple evaluation factors and the final assessment. This system collects, processes, and integrates numerous factors automatically, reducing manual complexity while maintaining comprehensive evaluation through systematic data processing and analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual evaluation methods are used, then flexibility in assessment is maintained, but objectivity and consistency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation flexibilityVSAvoidevaluation objectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated feedback mechanisms that consistently apply evaluation criteria across all human resources. The system objectively measures performance against predefined standards and provides consistent feedback, eliminating human bias while maintaining flexibility through configurable evaluation parameters that can be adjusted based on specific roles and requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10089109B2System and method for evaluating human resources in a software development environment
Publication Date: 2018.10.02 HCL TECH LTD
  • US10089109B2 patent drawing
  • US10089109B2 patent drawing
  • US10089109B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure discloses system and method for evaluating a human resource in a software development environment. At first, historical performance data and profile data associated with a plurality of human resources involved in a software project is received. From such data (historical performance data and profile data), a plurality of attributes is extracted. Further, Bayesian classification technique is implemented on the plurality of attributes in order to classify the plurality of attributes, of each human resource, into a plurality of classes. The plurality of attributes is classified in such a manner that at least one attribute corresponding to at least one human resource and at least one other human resource is classified into a class and another class respectively. Further, based on the classification of each attribute associated with the human resource, a grade is assigned to the human resource.