HRTF Database Matching Through Calibration Error Profiles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to provide personalized and immersive audio experiences for interactive content due to the unique physical interactions of each user's head, making it impractical to measure and replicate individual head-related transfer functions (HRTFs) for millions of users.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that generates a library of HRTFs for a plurality of reference individuals, allowing users to calibrate their audio experience by matching sound locations with their unique head shape, using a calibration test to identify the closest matching HRTF from the library without direct measurement, and optionally blending HRTFs for improved accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If individual HRTF measurement is performed for each user, then audio personalization quality is improved, but device complexity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveHRTF measurement accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement equipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a library of HRTF profiles from reference individuals and uses these copies to match with target users through calibration tests, avoiding the need for complex individual measurements while maintaining personalization quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces calibration tests as an intermediary mechanism that bridges the gap between reference HRTF profiles and target users, enabling indirect HRTF determination without direct measurement equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If individual HRTF measurement is performed for each user, then audio personalization quality is improved, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveHRTF measurement accuracyVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-generates a library of HRTF profiles from reference individuals before actual user matching, allowing rapid calibration through comparison rather than time-consuming individual measurements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

By using pre-recorded HRTF profiles as templates, the system enables quick matching through calibration tests rather than performing lengthy individual measurements for each user

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If a large HRTF library is created with many reference individuals, then matching accuracy is improved, but data storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching accuracyVSAvoiddata storage volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms complete HRTF measurements into condensed calibration profiles that capture essential characteristics, reducing storage requirements while preserving matching accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4205412B1Method for finding a best suited HRTF in a HRTF database
Publication Date: 2025.10.29 SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LLC
  • EP4205412B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4205412B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP4205412B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

An audio personalisation method for a first user comprises testing a first user on a calibration test, the calibration test comprising requiring a user to match a test sound to a test location, either by controlling the position of the presented sound or controlling the position of the presented location, for a sequence of test matches, each test sound being presented at a position using a default head related transfer function 'HRTF', receiving an estimate of each matching location from the first user, and calculating a respective error for each estimate, to generate a sequence of location estimate errors for the first user; and comparing at least some of the location estimate errors for the first user with estimate errors of the same locations previously generated for at least a subset of a corpus of reference individuals; identifying a reference individual with the closest match of compared location estimation errors to those of the first user; and using an HRTF, previously obtained for the identified reference individual, for the first user.