Head-Related Transfer Function Selection for AR Audio

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current approaches to using head-related transfer functions in acoustic devices for augmented reality are inefficient and impractical, requiring extensive computing resources and burdensome measurement processes, especially when individual user data is needed, and do not scale well.

Innovation Solution

An acoustic device with a sound emitting portion, a storing portion for head-related transfer functions, and a controlling portion that selects and applies the optimal head-related transfer function based on user-specific profile matching and location discrepancies from pre-measured models, using a mobile terminal device and headphones with a gyrosensor to determine the perceived sound location direction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If head-related transfer functions are measured for each individual user to improve sound localization accuracy, then the accuracy is improved, but the measurement process becomes burdensome and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound localization accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement process time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses pre-measured head-related transfer functions from a database of standardized head models as copies instead of measuring each user's actual acoustic characteristics. This allows the system to select from existing measured data (from various head types) rather than performing new measurements for each user, thereby maintaining accuracy while eliminating time-consuming individual measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The head-related transfer functions are measured and stored in advance in a database before actual use. This preliminary measurement of various head types allows the system to quickly select appropriate functions during actual audio processing without needing to perform measurements at the time of use, resolving the contradiction between accuracy and measurement time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If head-related transfer functions are measured for each individual user to improve sound localization accuracy, then the accuracy is improved, but the process becomes impractical for widespread use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound localization accuracyVSAvoidpracticality of deployment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses pre-measured head-related transfer functions from a database as copies rather than performing new measurements for each user. This approach maintains accuracy by using real measured data while making deployment practical, as the system can simply select from existing data without requiring complex measurement equipment or procedures at the point of use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal database of head-related transfer functions that can serve multiple users with different head characteristics. This single database serves the universal need of accurate sound localization across diverse users, eliminating the need for individualized measurement processes and making widespread deployment practical.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If pre-measured head-related transfer functions are used to avoid individual measurement, then the process becomes efficient, but the system complexity increases due to multiple function candidates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from user responses (such as head orientation detection via sensors or user input about perceived sound location) to iteratively select the most appropriate head-related transfer function from the database. This feedback mechanism allows the system to efficiently narrow down from multiple candidates to the best match, maintaining efficiency while managing complexity through intelligent selection algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters such as head orientation angles, head size, or other acoustic characteristics to select the appropriate head-related transfer function from the database. By transforming the selection problem into parameter matching, the system efficiently handles multiple function candidates through straightforward parameter comparison rather than complex analysis, resolving the contradiction between efficiency and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11252526B2Acoustic device and head-related transfer function selecting method
Publication Date: 2022.02.15 YAMAHA CORP
  • US11252526B2 patent drawing
  • US11252526B2 patent drawing
  • US11252526B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An acoustic device includes binaural speakers, a storing portion for storing a plurality of head-related transfer functions, and a signal processing portion for processing a sound signal with a head-related transfer function. Two or more function candidates are selected from the plurality of head-related transfer functions. Prescribed test sounds are emitted from the speaker. A function candidate to apply to the user is selected based on a discrepancy between a user-perceived location direction and the sound generation location direction for each function candidate.