Selective HSPC Mobilization for In Vivo Gene Therapy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for in vivo transduction of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells are inefficient due to physical barriers in the bone marrow and are not suitable for patients with certain hemoglobinopathies, such as sickle cell disease, where G-CSF mobilization is contraindicated, leading to unselective cell mobilization and reduced effective vector dose.

Innovation Solution

The use of a C-X-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CXCR2) agonist like Gro-β or its variants, in combination with a CXCR4 antagonist, to mobilize hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from the bone marrow into peripheral blood, followed by transduction with a nucleic acid containing a selection marker and administration of a selection agent to ensure only transduced cells survive.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If G-CSF is used as a mobilization agent, then hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells are mobilized into peripheral blood, but unselective cell mobilization occurs leading to leukocytosis and higher cytokine levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of mobilized HSPCsVSAvoidleukocytosis and cytokine levels
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using a dual-agent mobilization regimen (CXCR4 antagonist plus CXCR2 agonist) that selectively mobilizes primitive HSPCs while leaving committed cells in the bone marrow. This creates a differentiated quality of mobilization where only the desired cell population is released, avoiding the unselective mobilization and associated harmful effects of G-CSF alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the mobilization parameters by switching from G-CSF monotherapy to a combination of CXCR4 antagonist and CXCR2 agonist. This parameter change results in altered cell mobilization characteristics: selective release of primitive HSPCs with reduced leukocytosis and lower cytokine production, thereby resolving the contradiction between cell yield and harmful effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If G-CSF/AMD3100 mobilization is used, then HSPCs are mobilized into peripheral blood, but the effective vector dose for primitive HSPCs is reduced due to sequestration by committed cells

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffective vector doseVSAvoidvector sequestration by non-target cells
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves selective mobilization of primitive HSPCs using the CXCR4 antagonist plus CXCR2 agonist regimen, ensuring that only the target cell population is released into peripheral blood. This eliminates sequestration by committed cells, maximizing the effective vector dose delivered to primitive HSPCs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of vector sequestration into a benefit by using selective mobilization. Instead of all cells competing for the vector, only primitive HSPCs are mobilized, ensuring that the vector dose is efficiently utilized by the target cells and improving transduction efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If ex vivo gene therapy is used, then gene correction can be achieved, but the procedure is costly and requires complex manufacturing with cell culture and toxic conditioning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegene correction efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex manufacturing steps (cell culture, ex vivo transduction, toxic conditioning) from the gene therapy process by implementing in vivo transduction. The simplified approach involves only mobilization and direct vector administration, eliminating the need for complex laboratory procedures while maintaining gene correction efficacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the traditional ex vivo approach by performing transduction in vivo rather than ex vivo. Instead of harvesting cells, culturing them, transducing them in the lab, and reinfusing them, the method mobilizes cells and administers the vector directly in the patient, reversing the sequence and eliminating manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Ease of operation

If in vivo transduction is attempted without selective mobilization, then the procedure is simpler, but transduction efficiency is low due to physical barriers of bone marrow stroma

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocedure simplicityVSAvoidtransduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by selectively mobilizing primitive HSPCs into peripheral blood before vector administration. This pre-mobilization step removes the physical barriers of bone marrow stroma that would otherwise prevent efficient transduction, ensuring that the vector can access the target cells effectively when administered in vivo.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively mobilizes and transduces hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, allowing for gene therapy to correct genetic defects in blood cells, reducing leukocytosis and cytokine levels, and providing a more selective and efficient method compared to traditional G-CSF/AMD3100 mobilization regimens.

Implementation Method 1

mobilizing hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from bone marrow using a C-X-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CXCR2) agonist, such as Gro-β

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemokine receptor signaling:

Implementation Method 2

optionally in combination with a C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) antagonist

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemokine receptor antagonism:

Data Source

PatentUS20230330185A1Methods and compositions for transducing hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in vivo
Publication Date: 2023.10.19 ENSOMA INC
  • US20230330185A1 patent drawing
  • US20230330185A1 patent drawing
  • US20230330185A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to the in vivo transduction of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in a subject, such as a human subject, and to the treatment of subjects suffering from various pathologies, such as blood diseases, metabolic disorders, cancers, and autoimmune diseases, among others.