HTB Gateway Protocol Transformation Engine

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Healthcare systems using different protocols and message formats face compatibility issues with the Healthcare Transaction Base (HTB), requiring custom adapters that are resource-intensive and costly to develop and maintain, delaying implementation and draining already depleted budgets.

Innovation Solution

A gateway acts as a transformation engine using filters to convert messages between various protocols, including HL7 V3, allowing for easy addition of new protocols and supporting both synchronous and asynchronous communication, with a plug-in architecture and dynamic filter deployment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If custom adapters are designed for each Interface Engine to transform messages to HTB protocol, then communication compatibility between different systems and HTB is achieved, but development time, resource consumption, and maintenance burden increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication compatibilityVSAvoidadapter complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal adapter framework that can handle multiple protocols (HL7 V2, HL7 V3, XML, CSV, EDI) through a single unified architecture. The framework uses protocol-specific parsers and message transformers that can be dynamically selected based on the incoming message type, eliminating the need for separate custom adapters for each Interface Engine while maintaining full communication compatibility across all protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediate message transformation layer between the Interface Engine and HTB that acts as a mediator. This layer includes a message parser that identifies the protocol type, a message transformer that converts the message to the target format, and a message sender that delivers it to HTB. This intermediary approach centralizes the transformation logic and reduces overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If custom adapters are designed for each Interface Engine, then protocol transformation capability is achieved, but implementation time is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotocol transformation capabilityVSAvoidimplementation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-configures the adapter framework with support for multiple protocols (HL7 V2, HL7 V3, XML, CSV, EDI) and their corresponding parsers and transformers before deployment. The framework includes pre-built message structures, validation rules, and transformation templates that are ready to use, allowing rapid integration with new Interface Engines without requiring time-consuming custom development for each protocol.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the adapter functionality into independent, reusable components: protocol identifiers, message parsers, message transformers, and message senders. Each component can be independently configured and selected based on the specific protocol requirements, allowing the system to quickly adapt to new protocols by simply adding or configuring the relevant segment rather than building a complete custom adapter from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If custom adapters are maintained for each Interface Engine, then protocol-specific communication is supported, but maintenance resources are depleted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotocol-specific communication supportVSAvoidmaintenance ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal maintenance approach where a single adapter framework handles all protocols. The framework includes centralized configuration files, unified error handling, and standardized logging mechanisms that work across all protocol types. This allows maintenance personnel to update, debug, and maintain the system through a single codebase rather than managing multiple separate adapter implementations, significantly reducing maintenance resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms including message validation, error reporting, and logging that provide real-time information about message transformation success and failure. The system validates incoming messages against protocol-specific rules, provides detailed error messages for debugging, and logs transformation operations for audit and troubleshooting purposes. This feedback enables proactive maintenance and rapid issue resolution without requiring deep protocol-specific expertise for each adapter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7881336B2HTB gateway for healthcare transaction base
Publication Date: 2011.02.01 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US7881336B2 patent drawing
  • US7881336B2 patent drawing
  • US7881336B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for communicating with a Healthcare Transaction Base, such as an HTB, without requiring the development of custom adapters are provided. A gateway is utilized that acts a transformation engine between various systems and the healthcare transaction base. One or more filters are utilized to transform a message from one format to another. Adding support for new protocols is simplified as support for a new protocol is added (or plugged-in) by associating any filters that are used to transform messages in the new protocol to a desired protocol.