Hydrothermal Carbonization Reactor Steam Injection and Mixing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sludge treatment reactors face challenges with high energy consumption, poor control over steam injection, clogging from solid debris, and expensive fragile mixer-injectors, particularly in hydrothermal carbonization processes.

Innovation Solution

A reactor design with a steam injection zone separated from the sludge introduction zone, allowing steam to be injected against the sludge circulation direction, and featuring a circulator to optimize turbulence and a hydrocyclone for particle removal, which reduces energy costs and minimizes reactor clogging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If steam is injected at the same location as sludge introduction, then mixing is enhanced, but energy consumption increases and dryness control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedryness controlVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor divides the treatment process into distinct zones: a sludge introduction zone, a steam injection zone located downstream, and a mixing zone. This spatial segmentation allows independent optimization of each function, preventing the energy loss and dryness control issues caused by simultaneous injection at the same location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Sludge is introduced and pre-mixed before reaching the steam injection zone. This preliminary action ensures that sludge is properly distributed and conditioned before steam addition, allowing for more efficient energy utilization and better control over the final moisture content of the treated sludge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If solid debris is present in sludge, then treatment completeness is maintained, but reactor clogging and damage occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment completenessVSAvoidreactor operation continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A hydrocyclone separation device is installed upstream of the reactor to remove solid debris and particles from the sludge before it enters the reaction system. This preliminary separation protects the reactor from clogging and damage while maintaining treatment effectiveness on the liquid sludge portion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The hydrocyclone acts as an intermediary device between the raw sludge feed and the reactor. It selectively separates harmful solid particles from the sludge stream, allowing the reactor to process only the suitable liquid phase without encountering clogging or damage from debris.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Stability of the object's composition

If mixer-injectors are used for homogenization, then mixing efficiency improves, but device cost and fragility increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixture homogeneityVSAvoiddevice cost and durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor design utilizes the natural flow dynamics and circulation patterns within the reactor vessel to achieve homogenization of the sludge-steam mixture. The reactor structure itself, through its geometry and flow paths, provides the mixing function that would otherwise require separate mechanical mixer-injectors, eliminating the need for expensive and fragile mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical mixer-injector systems with a flow-based mixing approach. By designing the reactor to create natural circulation and turbulence through its internal geometry and operating conditions, mechanical mixing devices are eliminated in favor of a simpler, more robust flow-driven mixing mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances energy efficiency, reduces operational costs, and prevents reactor damage from solid debris, while improving the homogenization of the sludge-steam mixture and the separation of gaseous effluents.

Implementation Method 1

a steam inlet (3) arranged to inject steam into a steam injection zone (2b) of the inner chamber along a steam injection direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

allowing steam to be injected against the sludge circulation direction, and featuring a circulator to optimize turbulence

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Implementation Method 3

featuring a circulator to optimize turbulence and a hydrocyclone for particle removal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal separation: Centrifugal Separation

Data Source

PatentUS10151480B2Reactor for hydrothermal carbonization with optimized mixture of sludge and steam
Publication Date: 2018.12.11 SUEZ INTERNATIONAL
  • US10151480B2 patent drawing
  • US10151480B2 patent drawing
  • US10151480B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a reactor for treating, particularly by hydrothermal carbonization, sludge containing organic matter, including, with:a vessel (100) including an inner chamber arranged to receive the sludge and to form a path of travel for the sludge adapted to allow for circulation of the sludge,a sludge inlet (1) arranged to introduce the sludge into a sludge introduction area of the inner chamber,a sludge outlet (11) arranged to discharge at least part of the sludge contained in the inner chamber, anda steam inlet (3) arranged to inject steam in a steam injection zone of the inner chamber along a steam injection direction, the steam injection direction being different from a sludge circulation direction in the steam injection zone along the circulation path, the steam injection zone being separated from the sludge introduction zone.