HTS Coil Ramping Control for Screening Current Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Superconducting magnets using high temperature superconducting (HTS) materials face challenges with screening currents during ramp-up, which cause local stress and degrade the critical current of the tapes, leading to potential damage and reduced performance.

Innovation Solution

A method of controlling the transport current and net cooling power in HTS coils to maintain the ratio of transport current to critical current above a threshold, keeping the coil near saturation during ramping, thereby reducing the formation of screening currents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the transport current is ramped up quickly to achieve high productivity, then the ramping time is reduced, but screening currents form and cause local stress that degrades the critical current and may damage the coil

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveramping speedVSAvoidcoil integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamic control of the ramping rate, adjusting it in real-time based on the coil's thermal and electrical state. The ramping rate is not fixed but varies during the energization process to maintain the I/Ic ratio within safe limits, preventing screening current formation while achieving efficient charging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control by continuously monitoring the transport current I and critical current Ic to calculate their ratio I/Ic. This feedback information is used to adjust the ramping rate dynamically, ensuring the ratio remains above the threshold and preventing damage from screening currents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the transport current is kept low to avoid forming screening currents, then the coil is protected from damage, but the time to reach the required operating current increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoil integrityVSAvoidramping time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The ramping rate is made dynamic rather than static. It starts conservatively when the coil is cold and I/Ic is low, then increases as the coil warms up and I/Ic increases. This dynamic adjustment minimizes the total ramping time while始终保持保护条件.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operating parameters during the ramping process. The ramping rate is adjusted as a function of the I/Ic ratio, which itself changes with temperature and current. This parameter adaptation allows optimal balancing of speed and safety throughout the charging process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If additional cooling is applied to maintain low temperature and increase critical current, then the I/Ic ratio increases and screening currents are reduced, but the system complexity and cooling power requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecritical current marginVSAvoidcooling control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system operates autonomously based on predefined control logic. It automatically adjusts the cooling power as a function of the I/Ic ratio without requiring complex real-time optimization algorithms or human intervention, simplifying the control system while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling power is adjusted as a variable parameter during the ramping process. By changing the cooling power in response to the I/Ic ratio, the system maintains an optimal safety margin without requiring maximum cooling capacity throughout, reducing the overall cooling system requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively limits the stresses on the HTS coil during ramp-up, reducing the risk of damage and maintaining high field homogeneity and stability, which is crucial for applications like NMR and MRI.

Implementation Method 1

All low temperature superconductors have a self-field critical temperature (the temperature above which the material cannot be superconducting even in zero external magnetic field) below about 30K

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuperconductivity: Superconductivity

Implementation Method 2

Cooling is applied to the HTS coil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat removal: Cooling

Implementation Method 3

A transport current is supplied to the HTS coil, the transport current starting at an initial transport current and varying over time to the final transport current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20250029761A1HTS Magnet Ramping to Reduce Screening Currents
Publication Date: 2025.01.23 TOKAMAK ENERGY
  • US20250029761A1 patent drawing
  • US20250029761A1 patent drawing
  • US20250029761A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of energizing or de-energizing a high temperature superconducting, HTS, coil, from an initial transport current to a final transport current. The HTS coil comprises a plurality of turns of HTS material. A transport current is supplied to the HTS coil, the transport current starting at the initial transport current and varying over time to the final transport current. Cooling is applied to the HTS coil. An operating condition of the HTS coil is monitored, wherein the operating condition is indicative of a ratio I/Ic of the transport current, I, to a critical current, Ic, of the HTS material in at least a part of the HTS coil. One or both of the transport current applied to the coil and a net cooling applied to the coil are controlled in a feedback loop responsive to the operating condition, in order to maintain the operating condition in a desired range during energisation or de-energisation, such that the indicated ratio I/Ic is maintained above a threshold ratio (e.g. 0.7).