HTTP Response Header Invalidation for Cache Staleness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mechanisms for invalidating stale cache responses in HTTP requests, such as timestamp-based and out-of-band invalidation, are inefficient and pose security risks, especially when caching occurs behind a firewall, and are limited by their requirement for extra overhead and specific ports, while ESI inline invalidation only works with HTML content.

Innovation Solution

A response header invalidation mechanism that embeds an invalidation directive within the HTTP response header, allowing for efficient and secure invalidation of cached content without additional port overhead or security risks, and functioning with any content type, not just HTML.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If out-of-band invalidation is used to invalidate cached content, then invalidation can be performed, but extra overhead is required to establish a separate connection over a special invalidation port and security risks arise from poking holes through firewalls

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinvalidation capabilityVSAvoidconnection overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the invalidation function with the existing HTTP response mechanism by embedding invalidation directives in response headers. This merges two separate functions (content delivery and invalidation signaling) into a single HTTP response, eliminating the need for separate invalidation connections and ports, thereby reducing connection overhead and firewall complexity while maintaining reliable invalidation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The HTTP response header is given multi-functionality by embedding both content metadata and invalidation directives within the same header structure. This allows the existing HTTP infrastructure to serve dual purposes: delivering content information and simultaneously providing invalidation signals, thus eliminating the need for dedicated invalidation ports and reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If timestamp-based invalidation is used, then cached responses can be marked as invalid, but users have difficulty setting the timestamp value a-priori as they do not know how long a cached entry will remain valid

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestale content detectionVSAvoidtimestamp configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The origin server automatically generates and embeds the invalidation directive in the response header based on its own knowledge of content validity. This eliminates the need for users or cache systems to manually configure timestamp values, as the invalidation information is self-provided by the content authority (origin server) within the HTTP response itself, making the system easier to operate while maintaining reliable stale content detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If ESI inline invalidation is used, then invalidation can be embedded in the response body, but it only works when the response body contains an HTML document since ESI tags can only be embedded in HTML

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinvalidation embeddingVSAvoidcontent type compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the invalidation mechanism to work with any content type by placing invalidation directives in the HTTP response header rather than embedding them in the response body. Since HTTP headers are universally supported regardless of content type (HTML, XML, JSON, binary, etc.), this approach makes the invalidation mechanism adaptable to all content types, eliminating the limitation of ESI tags that only work with HTML documents

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If out-of-band invalidation requests are sent, then cached content can be invalidated, but they can have difficulty getting scheduled if normal HTTP request activity has reached a capacity limit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinvalidation deliveryVSAvoidscheduling delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the invalidation signal with the existing HTTP response traffic by embedding invalidation directives in response headers. This allows invalidation to be delivered piggybacking on normal HTTP responses that are already being sent to clients, eliminating the need for separate invalidation requests that would compete for scheduling resources. Consequently, invalidation delivery becomes more reliable and timely without adding scheduling delays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10212247B2Response header invalidation
Publication Date: 2019.02.19 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US10212247B2 patent drawing
  • US10212247B2 patent drawing
  • US10212247B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and other embodiments associated with content invalidation are described. One example method includes parsing a response to identify an invalidation directive. Then if identified, invalidating cached content from a cache memory that corresponds to the content identified by an invalidation directive.