Human-Controlled Virtual Driving Scenarios for AD/ADAS Corner Cases

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for testing autonomous driving (AD) and advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) require extensive real-world testing to validate corner case scenarios, which is time-consuming, costly, and impractical, hindering market penetration due to the low exposure rate of safety-critical scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A virtual environment simulating real-world scenarios is created using fully computer-controlled and human-controlled movable virtual objects, allowing users to generate and identify corner case scenarios, thereby facilitating the testing of AD/ADAS functionality without extensive real-world driving, leveraging crowdsourcing for scenario generation and validation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If real-world testing is conducted to validate corner case scenarios, then reliability of AD/ADAS functionality is improved, but time consumption and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation of corner case scenariosVSAvoidtesting duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of real-world driving scenarios, including corner cases, in a simulated environment. These virtual scenarios replicate the essential characteristics of real-world situations without requiring actual physical testing, thereby validating AD/ADAS functionality significantly faster while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary identification and generation of corner case scenarios through virtual simulation before conducting any real-world testing. By pre-validating scenarios in the virtual environment, the patent reduces the time and resources needed for subsequent real-world testing phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If real-world testing is conducted to expose vehicles to corner case scenarios, then safety validation is improved, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety validationVSAvoidresources required
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces resource-intensive real-world testing with virtual simulations that copy the essential features of corner case scenarios. This approach maintains safety validation effectiveness while dramatically reducing the consumption of physical resources such as test vehicles, test tracks, and human testers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables automated identification and generation of corner case scenarios through the virtual environment itself, without requiring extensive human intervention or physical test infrastructure. The virtual system self-generates and self-validates scenarios, reducing external resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If extensive real-world testing is performed, then coverage of corner case scenarios is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescenario coverageVSAvoidtesting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses virtual simulations to copy and replicate corner case scenarios that would be extremely difficult to encounter in real-world testing. This enables comprehensive scenario coverage including rare and edge cases without the productivity loss associated with billions of kilometers of physical testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary virtual testing to achieve comprehensive scenario coverage before real-world deployment. This preliminary action in the virtual environment ensures that all necessary corner cases are identified and validated, eliminating the need for prolonged real-world testing and thereby improving overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Loss of time

If virtual simulation is used to generate scenarios, then time efficiency is improved, but complexity of the testing system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting durationVSAvoidvirtual environment system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual environment that copies the essential characteristics of the real world needed for AD/ADAS testing. While this virtual copy adds system complexity, it enables rapid scenario generation and validation that far outweighs the computational overhead, achieving time efficiency gains of billions of kilometers equivalent testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11945465B2Method and device for supporting generation of scenarios for testing autonomous driving and/or advanced driver assistance system functionality
Publication Date: 2024.04.02 ZENUITY AB
  • US11945465B2 patent drawing
  • US11945465B2 patent drawing
  • US11945465B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and device for supporting generation of scenarios for testing autonomous driving and/or advanced driver assistance system, AD/ADAS, functionality for real world vehicles. A device (101; 500) provides (301) a virtual environment (200) simulating an environment relevant for operation of vehicles having said AD/ADAS functionality and in which is operating: fully computer controlled movable virtual objects (230a-c), human controlled movable virtual objects (220) and at least one virtual AD/ADAS vehicle (210) operating according to said AD/ADAS functionality. The device allows (303) a user of the device (101; 500) to, via user interface (506), control said one or more human controlled movable virtual objects (220) during operation and thereby cause generation of scenarios that the virtual AD/ADAS vehicle (210) is subjected to.