Human-Machine Team Optimization for Geographic Digitization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automatic approaches for geographic region digitization in GIS face challenges such as lack of robust iterative methods, inconsistencies in imagery outputs, fuzziness of feature boundaries, and difficulty in scaling to large datasets due to O(log N) complexity and concept drift.

Innovation Solution

A method that optimizes the feature space for a human-machine team using a greedy sequential feature selection algorithm and black-box global optimization, dynamically selecting features to maximize accuracy and adapt to context shifts, incorporating compositional interface schemata for finer-grained performance evaluation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automatic approaches are used for region digitization, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to lack of robust iterative approaches and nuanced pitfalls

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedigitization speedVSAvoidvertex placement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic feature selection where the feature space is adaptively adjusted based on image characteristics and digitization progress. The machine learning model dynamically selects relevant features from a larger set, allowing the system to adapt to different imaging conditions and maintain high precision while automating the digitization process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the machine learning model continuously learns from digitization results and adjusts its feature selection and vertex placement predictions. This iterative feedback loop allows the automatic system to improve its precision over time while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If instance-based online machine learning is used for quick convergence, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases due to O(log N) complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvergence speedVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and utilizes only the most relevant features from the image data for vertex placement tasks, rather than processing all possible features. This feature extraction approach reduces the effective dimensionality of the problem, decreasing computational complexity while maintaining fast convergence through focused processing of critical features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters dynamically by selecting different feature subsets based on the specific digitization context. This parameter adaptation allows the model to achieve fast convergence on relevant features while avoiding the computational burden of processing all possible features, effectively managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a single technique is used to cover all cases, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability deteriorates due to fuzziness of feature boundaries and inconsistencies in imagery outputs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidrobustness to imagery variations
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal feature selection framework that can handle multiple types of imagery and digitization tasks through a single integrated approach. The machine learning model is designed to work across different image sources and conditions by selecting context-appropriate features, providing both simplicity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system adapts to different imagery conditions by dynamically changing feature parameters and selection criteria based on the specific image characteristics and task requirements. This allows a single system to handle diverse cases effectively without requiring multiple specialized techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If the machine learning model processes large datasets, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to concept drift and sudden changes in environmental conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescaling capabilityVSAvoidaccuracy under concept drift
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic feature selection that adapts to concept drift by continuously adjusting which features are most relevant for current data patterns. This dynamic adaptation allows the model to maintain high precision even when processing large datasets with varying environmental conditions, as the feature set evolves with the data distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240371145A1Method and System for Optimization of a Human-Machine Team for Geographic Region Digitization
Publication Date: 2024.11.07 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
  • US20240371145A1 patent drawing
  • US20240371145A1 patent drawing
  • US20240371145A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method that includes receiving a set of one or more images, each having one or more sets of pixels, receiving a ground truth value that a vertex point associated with a transition between two regions in a respective set of pixels, identifying a machine placement candidate vertex point for a first set of pixels, determining a set of one or more selected candidate features in the set of candidate features that maximizes an objective function that identifies an accuracy of the identified machine placement candidate vertex point compared to the respective ground truth for a respective set of pixels, updating a set of one or more basis features by adding the set of one or more selected candidate features that maximizes the objective function, and training a machine learning model based on the updated set of one or more basis features to identify additional vertex points for a transition.