Human Operator Digital Twins for Real-Time Risk Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to effectively monitor and mitigate risks faced by human operators in complex environments, leading to increased accident likelihood due to factors like fatigue, noise exposure, and environmental stress.

Innovation Solution

A digital twin system that integrates sensor data with ontologies and machine learning models to assess and quantify operational risks, providing real-time monitoring and risk mitigation strategies for human operators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional monitoring systems are used to track worker conditions, then basic safety monitoring is provided, but the systems fail to effectively detect and quantify operational risks in real-time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments risk assessment into multiple independent modules: environmental condition sensors (noise, temperature, lighting), physiological state sensors (heart rate, body temperature), task complexity analysis, and digital twin simulation components. Each module processes specific parameters independently, then integrates results to provide comprehensive risk quantification, thereby improving detection accuracy without overwhelming system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The digital twin serves as an intermediary between physical worker monitoring and risk assessment. It creates a virtual representation that processes sensor data through simulated environmental conditions and task scenarios, enabling accurate risk prediction without requiring direct complex interactions between all monitoring components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive sensor data collection is implemented to monitor all environmental and physiological factors, then risk assessment accuracy is improved, but data processing complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most critical risk indicators from comprehensive sensor data through the digital twin simulation. Instead of processing all raw sensor data, the digital twin identifies and extracts key parameters (such as critical physiological thresholds, dangerous environmental combinations) that most significantly impact risk assessment, reducing computational complexity while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial monitoring of all possible parameters simultaneously, using the digital twin to determine which specific sensor readings require full processing at any given moment. Based on current environmental conditions and task requirements, the system selectively intensifies processing of relevant data streams while reducing processing of less critical parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If real-time digital twin updates are performed to reflect current worker state, then proactive risk mitigation is enabled, but computational energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk mitigation effectivenessVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The digital twin updates are performed periodically at optimized intervals rather than continuously. The system determines appropriate update frequencies based on task criticality, environmental stability, and worker physiological state, performing comprehensive updates only when conditions warrant while maintaining surveillance between updates, thereby reducing computational energy consumption while preserving risk mitigation effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20250328843A1Digitalizing environment induced risk state in humans
Publication Date: 2025.10.23 DELL PROD LP
  • US20250328843A1 patent drawing
  • US20250328843A1 patent drawing
  • US20250328843A1 patent drawing

AI summary

One example method includes receiving, by a platform from a first module associated with a device configured to function in an operating environment, environment attribute data concerning attributes of the operating environment, receiving, by the platform from a second module associated with the device, human operator data concerning attributes of a human operator of the device, applying an ontology to the environment attribute data and to the human operator data, based on the applying of the ontology, determining risk state information concerning the human operator, and updating a digital twin with the risk state information.