Humanized CD28 Animal Models for Reliable Immune Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional drug development methods for immune-related diseases and cancers rely on in vitro screening and conventional animal models, which fail to replicate the human body environment and tumor microenvironment, leading to high failure rates and discrepancies between animal and clinical trial results.

Innovation Solution

Development of genetically modified animal models expressing human or chimeric CD28 proteins, allowing for the study of CD28 function, antibody screening, and drug evaluation in a more human-relevant context.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional animal models are used for in vivo pharmacological testing, then the complexity of the model is low and ease of manufacture is high, but the reliability of test results is poor due to species differences and inability to replicate human body environment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of test resultsVSAvoidcomplexity of animal model
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by selectively humanizing specific components of the animal model - introducing human CD28 gene and human B7-1/B7-2 proteins at specific loci - while maintaining the rest of the animal genome as conventional. This allows the model to have human-relevant immune interaction capabilities at the target site while retaining animal physiology elsewhere, thus improving reliability without requiring complete humanization of the entire organism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses an intermediary approach by creating a chimeric model where human immune proteins (CD28, B7-1, B7-2) are introduced into an animal system. This intermediary model serves as a bridge between conventional animal models and human subjects, allowing pharmacological testing in an in vivo environment that more closely mimics human immune responses without requiring full humanization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If in vitro screening approaches are used for drug development, then the cost and time investment are low, but the reliability of results is poor due to inability to provide body environment such as tumor microenvironment and immune cell interaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of drug screening resultsVSAvoidefficiency of drug development
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates an intermediary in vivo model that combines animal physiology with human immune proteins, serving as a middle ground between simple in vitro screening and expensive clinical trials. This model provides the body environment (tumor microenvironment, immune cell interactions) that in vitro systems lack, while being more cost-effective and faster than full human clinical trials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key parameters of the testing system by introducing human CD28 and human B7-1/B7-2 proteins into the animal model. This parameter change enables the model to respond to anti-CD28 antibodies in a human-relevant manner, improving the predictive value of drug screening results while maintaining the practical advantages of animal modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If complete humanization of animal models is performed, then the reliability of human antibody screening is maximized, but the complexity of model preparation and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of human antibody screeningVSAvoidease of model preparation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by selectively humanizing only the necessary components - CD28 receptor and B7-1/B7-2 ligands - rather than completely humanizing the entire animal model. This targeted approach achieves sufficient reliability for human antibody screening while keeping model preparation complexity and costs manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by introducing only the specific human proteins needed for CD28 pathway research rather than complete humanization. This partial humanization provides adequate reliability for screening anti-CD28 antibodies and studying human immune responses without the excessive complexity and cost of full humanization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11350614B2Genetically modified non-human animal with human or chimeric CD28
Publication Date: 2022.06.07 BIOCYTOGEN PHARMACEUTICALS (BEIJING) CO LTD
  • US11350614B2 patent drawing
  • US11350614B2 patent drawing
  • US11350614B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to genetically modified non-human animals that express a human or chimeric (e.g., humanized) CD28, and methods of use thereof.