Humic Acid Graphene Supercapacitor Electrodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current supercapacitors face challenges with low volumetric capacitances and energy densities due to limitations in electrode thickness, active material mass loading, and the tendency of graphene sheets to re-stack, leading to reduced specific surface areas and tap densities.

Innovation Solution

A supercapacitor electrode comprising a mixture of graphene sheets and humic acid, with humic acid occupying 0.1% to 99% by weight, and graphene sheets selected from pristine or non-pristine materials, achieving high specific surface areas and preventing graphene re-stacking, allowing for thicker electrodes with higher active material mass loading and tap densities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If graphene sheets are used as electrode material to increase specific surface area, then capacitance density is improved, but graphene sheets tend to re-stack which reduces specific surface area and tap density

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecific surface areaVSAvoidgraphene sheet structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Humic acid acts as an intermediary substance between graphene sheets, preventing them from re-stacking while maintaining electrical conductivity. The humic acid molecules fill the spaces between graphene sheets and provide conductive pathways, thus preserving the high specific surface area needed for capacitance while preventing structural degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite material system combining graphene sheets with humic acid. This composite structure leverages the high surface area of graphene while using humic acid to maintain sheet separation and provide additional conductive networks, thereby achieving both high capacitance and structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Volume of stationary object

If electrode thickness is increased to improve volumetric energy density, then energy storage capacity is improved, but mass loading and tap density are limited by material constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevolumetric energy densityVSAvoidactive material mass loading
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical and chemical parameters of the electrode material system by introducing humic acid, which enables increased electrode thickness without compromising mass loading density. The humic acid provides structural support and conductivity that allows thicker electrodes to maintain high active material content and tap density throughout the increased volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If conventional supercapacitor structures are used to maintain simplicity, then device complexity is low, but volumetric capacitance and energy density remain limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode structureVSAvoidvolumetric capacitance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes the porous structure formed by the humic acid-graphene composite to achieve high volumetric capacitance. The porous architecture provides extensive surface area for charge storage while maintaining a compact structure that fits within conventional device form factors, thereby increasing volumetric capacitance without significantly increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables the formation of supercapacitors with significantly higher active material mass loading, tap density, and volumetric energy density, overcoming the limitations of conventional supercapacitors by preventing graphene sheet re-stacking and optimizing electrode structure.

Implementation Method 1

preventing graphene sheet re-stacking

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic repulsion: Ion Repulsion/Attraction

Implementation Method 2

storing energy in the diffuse double layer. This double layer, created naturally at a solid-electrolyte interface when voltage is imposed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric double layer formation: Capacitance

Implementation Method 3

This surface area must be accessible by electrolyte and the resulting interfacial zones must be sufficiently large to accommodate the so-called electric double-layer charges

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS11450487B2Humic acid-based supercapacitors
Publication Date: 2022.09.20 NANOTEK INSTR GRP LLC
  • US11450487B2 patent drawing
  • US11450487B2 patent drawing
  • US11450487B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A supercapacitor electrode comprises a mixture of graphene sheets and humic acid. The humic acid occupies 0.1% to 99% by weight of the mixture and the graphene sheets are selected from a pristine graphene material having essentially zero % of non-carbon elements, or a non-pristine graphene material having 0.001% to 5% by weight of non-carbon elements. The non-pristine graphene is selected from graphene oxide, reduced graphene oxide, graphene fluoride, graphene chloride, graphene bromide, graphene iodide, hydrogenated graphene, nitrogenated graphene, chemically functionalized graphene, or a combination thereof. The mixture has a specific surface area greater than 500 m2/g.