Top-fill Hummingbird Feeder Float Valve Base Closure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hummingbird feeders face issues with frequent refilling, spillage risks, limited cleaning access, and potential for corrosion and insect contamination due to vacuum-based designs, which require inversion and manual dexterity for filling and cleaning.

Innovation Solution

A top-fill hummingbird feeder design featuring a vented container with a large top opening, a bottleneck-shaped lower end, and a float valve mechanism that allows nectar to flow into a feeding basin as needed, preventing vacuum conditions and enabling easy refilling and cleaning without inversion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a vacuum-based design is used to prevent nectar from draining rapidly, then nectar flow control is improved, but the feeder requires inversion for refilling and has limited cleaning access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenectar flow controlVSAvoidrefilling and cleaning access
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional vacuum-based design by placing the reservoir upright with a large top opening. Instead of using vacuum pressure to control flow, it employs a float valve mechanism that automatically opens and closes based on nectar level, eliminating the need for inversion during refilling and cleaning operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the vacuum mechanism entirely from the system, replacing it with a float valve-based automatic flow control system. This removal eliminates the operational constraints of inversion and limited access while maintaining reliable nectar flow control through the float valve's automatic opening and closing actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If the top opening is made small to maintain vacuum seal, then vacuum integrity is improved, but cleaning access to interior becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevacuum seal integrityVSAvoidcleaning access
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the approach by making the top opening large rather than small. Instead of relying on a small opening to maintain vacuum seal, it uses a float valve mechanism at the bottom to control flow, allowing the top opening to be large for easy cleaning access while maintaining flow control through the float valve system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Manufacturing precision

If a rotatable ring valve mechanism is used to control nectar flow, then flow control precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control precisionVSAvoidvalve mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex rotatable ring valve mechanism and replaces it with a simple float valve system. The float valve provides sufficient flow control precision through its automatic opening and closing based on nectar level, eliminating the need for complex rotatable mechanisms with multiple ports and openings while maintaining effective flow control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If the feeder is designed to be filled by dismantling and inverting, then vacuum seal is maintained, but spillage risk and manual dexterity requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevacuum seal maintenanceVSAvoidrefilling operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the refilling process by allowing the feeder to be filled upright through a large top opening without dismantling or inverting. The float valve mechanism maintains flow control during upright filling, eliminating spillage risks and manual dexterity requirements associated with inversion-based vacuum seal maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design provides a reliable, consumer-friendly feeder that allows easy top filling and cleaning, prevents overflow, and reduces the risk of contamination, while maintaining a vacuum-free operation for efficient nectar distribution.

Implementation Method 1

The top is vented to prevent a vacuum condition and allow atmospheric pressure to act on the column of nectar

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAtmospheric pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

A generally cylindrical float valve positioned in the feeding basin well and floating in the liquid nectar acts to close the bottleneck central opening when the feeding basin is filled with liquid nectar to the prescribed level

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 3

The bottom of the bottle or container has a lower bottom opening, preferably in the form of a bottleneck-shaped cylindrical extension with external threads that can be screw-threaded into an upstanding well of a feeding basin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThreaded mechanical fastening: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentUS10085427B2Top-fill hummingbird feeder with float valve base closure mechanism
Publication Date: 2018.10.02 WOODSTREAM CORP
  • US10085427B2 patent drawing
  • US10085427B2 patent drawing
  • US10085427B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A top-fill hummingbird feeder is provided having a liquid container with a liquid flow opening at a lower end and a removable cap at an upper end, a feeding basin positioned below the liquid container, and a valve or sealing mechanism associated with the liquid flow opening and the feeding basin. The feeding basin includes an upwardly extending cylindrical well that receives the lower end of the liquid container, and the valve or sealing mechanism includes a float valve associated with the well. The feeding basin is filled by gravity feed of the liquid in the container through the liquid flow opening when the sealing mechanism is open. When the feeding basin reaches a full position, the liquid nectar raises the float valve which, in turn, acts to close the liquid flow opening.