HVAC Extremum Control with Actuator Saturation Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Extremum seeking control strategies in HVAC systems often face actuator saturation issues, where the optimal settings for mechanical heating and cooling correspond to physical boundaries, leading to integrator windup and inefficient energy management.

Innovation Solution

A controller using an extremum seeking control strategy with an electronic circuit to compensate for actuator saturation by distinguishing between saturated and unsaturated states, adjusting the control loop to prevent windup and optimize damper positions for minimal mechanical cooling and heating requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If extremum seeking control is used to optimize HVAC system performance, then energy efficiency is improved, but actuator saturation occurs when optimal settings are outside physical boundaries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidactuator saturation
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by detecting actuator saturation conditions before they cause integrator windup. The controller monitors whether the actuator is at its saturation boundary and preemptively adjusts the extremum seeking control algorithm to prevent the integrator output from exceeding physical limits, thereby maintaining reliable operation while preserving energy optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring the actuator's saturation state and using this information to modify the extremum seeking control behavior. When saturation is detected, the controller adjusts the dither signal or integrator action based on feedback about the actuator's position relative to its boundaries, ensuring that energy optimization does not push the system into unreliable saturated states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the integrator drives the gradient to zero for optimization, then system performance is improved, but integrator windup occurs when the optimal point is outside the actuator's operating range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoidintegrator windup
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by implementing mechanisms that counteract integrator windup before it fully develops. The controller detects when the integrator output approaches saturation boundaries and preemptively clamps or resets the integrator state, preventing the harmful accumulation of error that would otherwise occur when the optimal point lies outside the actuator's physical range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by making the integrator's behavior adaptive based on the actuator's operating state. The controller dynamically adjusts the integrator gain or enables/disables integration based on whether the actuator is saturated, allowing the system to maintain high performance during normal operation while preventing windup when operating boundaries are approached.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of energy

If the actuator operates at physical boundaries to achieve optimal settings, then energy consumption is reduced, but the system loses adaptability to dynamic operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidsystem adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by using dither signals to periodically perturb the actuator position even when operating near boundaries. This periodic excitation allows the extremum seeking algorithm to continue gathering information about the performance landscape, enabling the system to maintain adaptability while operating at energy-optimal boundary points by periodically checking if conditions have changed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the extremum seeking control parameters (such as dither amplitude or integrator gain) based on the actuator's saturation state. When the actuator is saturated, the controller modifies these parameters to prevent windup while maintaining the ability to adapt to changing conditions, thus preserving both energy efficiency and system versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8200345B2Extremum seeking control with actuator saturation control
Publication Date: 2012.06.12 TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
  • US8200345B2 patent drawing
  • US8200345B2 patent drawing
  • US8200345B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An extremum seeking control method optimizes a control process for a plant such as an air handling unit. The method improves the performance of an extremum seeking control strategy by limiting, removing or preventing the effects of an actuator saturation condition, particularly as the extremum seeking control strategy relates to HVAC applications.