HVAC Fault Diagnosis Interface Using Causal Parameter Grouping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current HVAC control systems require operators to navigate through multiple screens of dense information to diagnose and remediate faults, making it inefficient to detect and address anomalies in HVAC system operations.

Innovation Solution

A building management system that includes a communications interface connected to HVAC devices, a device identifier to identify these devices, a fault detector to identify fault conditions, and a user interface generator to create a data-driven user interface displaying relevant system parameters and allowing operators to modify these parameters directly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If current HVAC control systems display dense information across multiple screens, then operators can access comprehensive system data, but operators require excessive time to navigate and diagnose faults

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive system dataVSAvoidfault diagnosis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the comprehensive system data into organized groups and categories (e.g., fault-related parameters, operational parameters, system components) and presents them in a structured hierarchical format. This allows operators to access comprehensive information while navigating through logically organized sections rather than dense unstructured data across multiple screens.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically detecting faults, identifying relevant parameters, and pre-organizing the displayed information based on the detected fault condition. When a fault is detected, the system proactively retrieves and displays only the parameters relevant to that specific fault, eliminating the need for operators to manually search through all system parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If the system displays all system parameters on a single interface, then operators can quickly access relevant information, but the interface becomes overly complex and difficult to navigate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation access timeVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interface is segmented into multiple organized sections or tabs (e.g., fault detection, parameter display, control functions, historical data) rather than presenting all information in a single dense view. Each section contains specific subsets of parameters relevant to that function, reducing cognitive load while maintaining comprehensive accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a two-dimensional flat display to a multi-dimensional hierarchical structure where parameters are organized by category, importance, and relationship to the detected fault. This allows operators to navigate through layers of information (e.g., general system status → specific fault area → detailed parameters) rather than searching across a flat complex interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If the system provides detailed fault information, then operators can accurately diagnose issues, but the information presentation becomes dense and hard to interpret

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection accuracyVSAvoidinformation interpretability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by providing different levels of information detail in different interface areas. Critical fault information is highlighted with prominent visual indicators and concise descriptions, while detailed technical parameters are organized in structured tables or expandable sections. This allows operators to quickly grasp the essential fault nature while accessing detailed information when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses color coding and visual indicators to differentiate between various fault severity levels, parameter types, and system states. Critical faults are highlighted with醒目的 colors, while normal operational parameters are displayed in neutral tones. This visual differentiation helps operators quickly interpret the significance of displayed information without being overwhelmed by text density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Data Source

PatentUS12292750B2HVAC system with data driven user interface for equipment commissioning and operation
Publication Date: 2025.05.06 TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
  • US12292750B2 patent drawing
  • US12292750B2 patent drawing
  • US12292750B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A building management system (BMS) operates a plurality of HVAC devices to affect a physical state or condition and detects a fault condition at a second HVAC device affected by the physical state or condition and having causal relationships with the plurality of HVAC devices such that faulty operation of one or more of the plurality of HVAC devices causes a detectable effect at the second HVAC device. The BMS identifies, based on the fault condition, a predetermined set of system parameters corresponding to the fault condition and comprising a plurality of system parameters of the plurality of HVAC devices that are potential causes of the fault condition. The BMS retrieves operating data for the predetermined set of system parameters and transmits a signal to display a user interface comprising the operating data on a display screen.