HVAC Duct Humidifier Control Using Temperature-Drop Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional air humidifiers in HVAC systems face inefficiencies due to variable water flow rates, leading to excessive water waste, as they do not adapt effectively to changes in environmental conditions, air flow rates, and temperature, resulting in suboptimal humidification output and inconsistent water drainage.

Innovation Solution

A humidifier control system that monitors temperature drops across the evaporator pad using upstream and downstream temperature sensors, adjusting water delivery based on predetermined fractions of the maximum temperature drop to minimize drain water while maintaining maximum humidification output, using a flow-through design with a control valve to optimize water usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If constant water flow rate is supplied to the evaporator pad, then humidification operation is maintained, but water waste increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehumidification operationVSAvoidwater waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from constant water flow to variable water flow control. The control system dynamically adjusts the water valve operation based on real-time temperature differential feedback, changing the water flow rate to match actual evaporation needs. This resolves the contradiction by making water supply adaptive rather than static, maintaining reliable humidification while minimizing water waste through precise demand-based delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control by continuously monitoring the temperature differential across the evaporator pad and using this information to adjust water valve operation. The upstream and downstream temperature sensors provide real-time feedback on evaporation rate, allowing the control system to optimize water flow accordingly. This feedback mechanism ensures water is supplied only when and where needed for evaporation, eliminating the water waste inherent in constant flow systems while maintaining consistent humidification performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Quantity of substance

If higher water pressure is supplied to increase water flow, then water delivery capacity improves, but excessive water flows through the evaporator pad causing flooding and increased waste

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater delivery capacityVSAvoidexcessive water flow
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the water flow rate parameter based on actual evaporation demand rather than maintaining a constant high flow rate. The control system modifies the water valve opening degree and timing according to temperature differential measurements, optimizing the water delivery parameter to match system needs. This resolves the contradiction by changing from a fixed high-flow parameter to a dynamically optimized parameter that prevents flooding while ensuring adequate water supply for evaporation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static high-pressure water supply to dynamic water flow control. The water valve operation is continuously adjusted based on feedback from temperature sensors, making the water delivery capacity adaptive to actual evaporation rates. This dynamic control prevents excessive water flow and flooding while maintaining sufficient water delivery capacity when needed, eliminating the water waste associated with constant high-pressure supply.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If larger evaporator pad surface area is used to increase evaporation capacity, then humidification output improves, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehumidification outputVSAvoidevaporator pad size
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the water flow rate parameter to maximize evaporation efficiency on the existing evaporator pad surface area. Rather than increasing pad size to boost humidification output, the control system adjusts water delivery parameters (flow rate, timing, distribution) to achieve maximum evaporation capacity from the available surface. This resolves the contradiction by improving productivity through parameter optimization rather than physical expansion, avoiding increased device complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical approach of increasing evaporator pad size with a control system approach. Instead of physically enlarging the evaporation surface to increase humidification output, the system uses intelligent water valve control based on temperature differential feedback to optimize evaporation rates on the existing pad. This substitution of mechanical expansion with control system optimization achieves higher productivity without increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Loss of substance

If time-based pulsing control is used to reduce water flow, then water savings are achieved, but humidification output becomes suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater savingsVSAvoidhumidification output
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by using real-time temperature differential measurements to guide water valve operation, replacing time-based open-loop pulsing with closed-loop control. The system continuously monitors evaporation effectiveness through temperature sensors and adjusts water flow accordingly, ensuring water is delivered at the optimal moment and rate for maximum evaporation. This feedback mechanism simultaneously achieves water savings and maintains optimal humidification output, resolving the contradiction inherent in fixed time-based control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static time-based pulsing to dynamic water flow control responsive to actual evaporation conditions. The water valve operation is continuously adjusted based on temperature differential feedback, making the water delivery dynamic and adaptive to real-time system needs. This dynamic control achieves both water savings and optimal humidification output by delivering water precisely when and at the rate needed for maximum evaporation efficiency, unlike fixed time-based pulsing which cannot adapt to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves a consistent ratio of minimal drain water to evaporative output across varying conditions, ensuring maximum humidification capacity with reduced water waste, independent of environmental changes and system variables, thus optimizing performance and water efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

the controller receiving a first input signal from the upstream temperature sensor and a second input signal from the downstream temperature sensor, the temperature sensors measuring the temperature drop of the air flow across the evaporator pad

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature measurement:

Implementation Method 2

the energy present in the air, added by the heating system, is used to evaporate water from the humidifier

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 3

the temperature drop of the air flow across the evaporator pad

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporative cooling: Evaporative Cooler

Data Source

PatentUS9285133B2Air humidification system
Publication Date: 2016.03.15 AIR DISTRIBUTION TECHNOLOGIES IP LLC
  • US9285133B2 patent drawing
  • US9285133B2 patent drawing
  • US9285133B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A humidifier for use in a central HVAC duct. The humidifier includes a water delivery system for applying water to an evaporator pad, a drain system for removing excess water that is not evaporated, and a control system employing two temperature sensors directly measuring the temperature of the air before and after the evaporator pad. The control system uses the two temperatures to adjust the water flow across the pad by cycling the water delivery system so that drain water is minimized while maximizing the evaporative capacity of the humidifier thus satisfying the humidification load as quickly as possible with the least amount of drain water. The humidifier may have either an integral fan or a flow-through housing for passing air across the wetted evaporator pad to increase the humidity level of the air.