Heating, ventilating, air conditioning, and refrigeration system with simultaneous sub-cooling and superheat control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional HVAC-R systems face limitations in optimizing sub-cooling and superheat control, as refrigerant charge is fixed before operation and cannot be adjusted during operation, leading to sub-optimal performance.

Innovation Solution

The system measures temperature and pressure at the evaporator and condenser outlets, using separate processors to generate control signals for the expansion valve and flow control valve to simultaneously manage superheat and sub-cooling, allowing for dynamic adjustment during operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If refrigerant charge is fixed before operation, then system structure is simple, but sub-cooling cannot be optimized during operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesub-cooling optimizationVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into two independent controllers: a sub-cooling controller that manages the flow control valve at the condenser outlet, and a superheat controller that manages the expansion valve at the evaporator inlet. This segmentation allows each controller to independently optimize its respective parameter without interfering with the other, enabling dynamic sub-cooling optimization while maintaining clear functional separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static refrigerant charge approach to dynamic control by implementing real-time adjustment of the flow control valve based on measured sub-cooling conditions. The sub-cooling controller continuously monitors temperature and pressure at the condenser outlet and dynamically adjusts the valve position to maintain optimal sub-cooling levels during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If separate controllers are used for sub-cooling and superheat, then both parameters can be optimized, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoidcontroller quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control functions are segmented into two specialized controllers: the sub-cooling controller focuses exclusively on optimizing condenser outlet conditions by controlling the flow control valve, while the superheat controller focuses on evaporator outlet conditions by controlling the expansion valve. This segmentation allows each controller to be simpler and more focused, rather than requiring one complex controller to manage all parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each controller independently measures its own control parameters (sub-cooling controller measures temperature and pressure at condenser outlet, superheat controller measures temperature and pressure at evaporator outlet) and autonomously adjusts its respective valve without requiring complex coordination or communication with the other controller, enabling decentralized self-service control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Temperature

If sub-cooling is controlled dynamically, then cooling performance improves, but measurement and control difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesub-cooling temperatureVSAvoidsub-cooling measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The flow control valve serves as an intermediary device that the sub-cooling controller uses to indirectly control the sub-cooling level. By adjusting the valve opening, the controller modulates refrigerant flow through the condenser, thereby controlling the sub-cooling temperature without requiring direct intervention in the thermodynamic process itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The sub-cooling controller implements closed-loop feedback control by continuously measuring the actual sub-cooling temperature and pressure at the condenser outlet, comparing these measurements to desired setpoints, and automatically adjusting the flow control valve position to eliminate any deviation, thereby maintaining optimal sub-cooling levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10648719B2Heating, ventilating, air conditioning, and refrigeration system with simultaneous sub-cooling and superheat control
Publication Date: 2020.05.12 DUNAN MICROSTAQ INC
  • US10648719B2 patent drawing
  • US10648719B2 patent drawing
  • US10648719B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling fluid flow through a heating, ventilating, air conditioning, and refrigeration (HVAC-R) system includes measuring temperature and pressure at an outlet of an evaporator of the HVAC-R system, wherein the evaporator is in fluid communication with a compressor, a condenser, an expansion device between the evaporator and the condenser, and a flow control valve between the compressor and the condenser, and measuring a sub-cooling temperature at an outlet of the condenser. The measured evaporator temperature and pressure data is sent to a first superheat processor, and the measured sub-cooling temperature data is send to a second superheat processor. A control signal to the expansion device from the first superheat processor and a control signal to the flow control valve from the second superheat processor are then simultaneously sent.