HVAC Reduced Capacity Mode for Demand Response Without Recovery Spikes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional demand response (DR) event management through setbacks in resource consumption devices like HVAC systems leads to increased consumption during recovery periods and customer discomfort, failing to effectively reduce overall resource consumption.

Innovation Solution

Implement a system that switches HVAC devices to a reduced capacity mode during DR events, prioritizing efficient resource consumption over satisfying the set point, allowing continuous operation with lower output to maintain comfort and reduce overall consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If setback settings are implemented during DR events to reduce resource consumption, then resource consumption during the DR event is reduced, but customer comfort deteriorates and consumption during recovery periods increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource consumption during DR eventVSAvoidcustomer comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the operational parameters of the consumption device based on real-time pricing signals and demand conditions. Instead of static setback settings, the device continuously optimizes its operation to balance resource consumption with comfort maintenance, adapting to changing conditions during DR events and recovery periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as temperature setpoints, capacity levels, and operational timing based on resource pricing and demand conditions. By intelligently adjusting these parameters, the system reduces consumption during high-price DR events while minimizing comfort impact and avoiding large recovery consumption spikes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If the device switches to reduced capacity mode during DR events, then resource consumption is reduced, but the ability to satisfy operational demand decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource consumptionVSAvoidability to satisfy operational demand
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by reducing capacity to the extent necessary to achieve consumption reduction goals during DR events, while maintaining sufficient capacity to meet minimum operational demands and comfort requirements. This balanced approach ensures that consumption is reduced without completely sacrificing the ability to satisfy operational demand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12498131B2Prioritizing efficient operation over satisfying an operational demand
Publication Date: 2025.12.16 TRANE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US12498131B2 patent drawing
  • US12498131B2 patent drawing
  • US12498131B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Architectures or techniques are presented that can prioritize operating a consumption device in a manner that is efficient in terms of consumption of a resource over satisfying a specified demand assigned to the consumption device. This re-prioritizing can be performed in response to a price of the resource exceeding a threshold.