HVAC Controller Using Temperature Differential for Compressor Staging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

HVAC systems often operate inefficiently when determining operating stages based on a single supply air temperature, leading to inadequate cooling and unnecessary increases in compressor speed, which can have little or no effect when the system is already operating at maximum capacity.

Innovation Solution

The HVAC controller directs the operation of the system based on the temperature difference across the evaporator coil, allowing for more precise control of compressor speed and blower volume, optimizing energy use by staging up or down based on actual cooling or heating demands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the HVAC system operates based on a single supply air temperature, then the control is simple, but the system operates inefficiently with unnecessary compressor speed increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol complexityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from multiple temperature sensors (supply air temperature and evaporator coil temperature) to continuously monitor system performance and adjust compressor speed accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables the controller to make informed decisions about compressor operation, avoiding unnecessary speed increases and reducing energy consumption while maintaining efficient cooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts compressor speed based on real-time temperature differential measurements. Rather than operating at fixed speeds, the compressor speed varies continuously according to the actual cooling demand indicated by the temperature difference between supply air and evaporator coil, optimizing energy efficiency while meeting cooling requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Power

If the compressor speed is increased to meet cooling demand, then the cooling capacity increases, but the energy consumption increases unnecessarily when already at maximum capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacityVSAvoidcompressor energy use
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The controller receives feedback from temperature sensors monitoring both supply air temperature and evaporator coil temperature. This feedback enables the system to determine when maximum cooling capacity is already being achieved, preventing unnecessary compressor speed increases that would waste energy. The system adjusts compressor speed based on actual cooling needs rather than operating assumptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces mechanical operation at fixed compressor speeds with electronically controlled variable-speed operation. The electronic controller modulates compressor speed continuously based on temperature differential feedback, substituting precise electronic control for crude mechanical on/off or fixed-speed operation, thereby eliminating energy waste from excessive compressor speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If the system operates at maximum compressor capacity, then the cooling demand is met, but further speed increases have little or no effect

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling outputVSAvoidwasted energy from excessive compressor speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from temperature sensors to detect when the temperature differential indicates maximum cooling capacity is already achieved. When the supply air temperature and evaporator coil temperature differential shows that full cooling demand is met, the controller prevents further compressor speed increases, avoiding energy waste from operating beyond maximum effective capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system avoids excessive action by not increasing compressor speed beyond what is necessary to meet cooling demand. By monitoring temperature differentials, the system determines the precise amount of cooling capacity needed and applies only that amount, rather than continuously operating at maximum speed and wasting energy from excessive compression capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9625169B2HVAC controller and method for operating an HVAC system based on a difference in temperature between return air and supply air and an HVAC system employing the controller or method
Publication Date: 2017.04.18 LENNOX IND INC
  • US9625169B2 patent drawing
  • US9625169B2 patent drawing
  • US9625169B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure provides an HVAC system, an HVAC controller and a method of operating an HVAC system. In one embodiment, the HVAC controller includes: (1) an interface configured to receive a thermostat call and (2) a processor configured to initiate operation of the HVAC system in response to the thermostat call and control operation thereof based on a temperature difference across a conditioning unit of the HVAC system.