Hybrid AI Control Architecture for Real-Time Adaptive Process Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing process control systems are limited by their inability to dynamically reprogram and adapt, relying on fixed intelligence categories like PID controllers, Inference Engines, and Neural Networks, which are difficult to reconfigure and require specialized hardware and extensive training.

Innovation Solution

A system combining Probabilistic Reasoning, Inference Engine Logic, Neural Networks, and Evolutionary Computation Structures, utilizing dynamically modifiable hybrid engines with sensors and multi-core processors, Field Programmable Gate Arrays, and a library of pre-programmed functions to enable real-time management and interaction with both hardware and software.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If fixed intelligence categories like PID controllers, Inference Engines, and Neural Networks are used, then system stability is maintained, but system adaptability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidsystem adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamically reconfigurable control system where the intelligence category (PID, IEL, NN, or DAI) can be changed at runtime through a reconfiguration interface. This allows the system to adapt to different process requirements while maintaining stability through controlled transitions between modes, directly resolving the contradiction between fixed stability and adaptive versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If Inference Engines with fixed fuzzy knowledge base are used, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases due to difficulty in reprogramming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreprogramming complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal control appliance that can function as multiple intelligence categories (PID, IEL, NN, DAI) through software configuration rather than hardware specialization. The reconfiguration interface allows users to switch between different control paradigms without complex reprogramming, making the system universally applicable to various process control needs while simplifying the user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If Neural Networks are used, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to specialized hardware requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidhardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces specialized neural network hardware with software-based neural network implementation on general-purpose processors. The neural network engine is implemented as executable code that can run on standard computing hardware, eliminating the need for dedicated neural network chips or specialized hardware while maintaining the precision benefits of neural network control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple intelligence categories are integrated, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol versatilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple intelligence categories (PID, IEL, NN, DAI) into a single integrated control appliance with a unified architecture. The hybrid engine combines probabilistic reasoning, inference engine logic, neural networks, and evolutionary computation structures into one cohesive system that can dynamically select and switch between different control paradigms, providing versatile adaptability without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11402807B1Dynamic artificial intelligence appliance
Publication Date: 2022.08.02 VAN LAAR KURT DANIEL
  • US11402807B1 patent drawing
  • US11402807B1 patent drawing
  • US11402807B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A control apparatus providing a Dynamic Artificial Intelligence system, which employs data sets and software functions representing a plurality interactive software engine's, including Inference, Neural Net, State, and Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) Engines. These engines are implemented as a set of scheduled realtime monitors and callable functions with associated processes preformed within a system. Monitors dynamically estimates and determine the optimal control policy for the system and its sub-systems. Monitors utilize an iterative process of sub-steps “function calls’, until a convergence states exist. Functions and subfunctions dynamically estimate the desired value for operation at a respective state of the environment over a series of predicted environmental states; using a complex return of data sets to determine bounds to improve the estimated currently desired value; and producing updated estimates of optimal control policies. DAI further interacts in realtime with external events to modify control policies.