Hybrid AI Control Platform for Real-Time Model Reconciliation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hybrid models for enterprise applications, such as HVAC and energy efficiency, fail to provide real-time accurate and interpretable recommendations due to limitations in data-based and physics-based models, including inadequate training on feature extraction, virtual sensors, and handling of missing data, leading to inconsistent and inaccurate results.

Innovation Solution

A method integrating data-based and physics-based models by configuring data-based models with historical field data and physics-based models with simulated data, using feature extraction and virtual sensors to validate and reconcile data, and providing feedback for real-time predictions and control actions, leveraging machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If a data-based model is used for real-time predictions, then execution speed is improved, but accuracy deteriorates under out-of-range operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution speedVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines data-based models with physics-based models into a hybrid framework. The physics-based model provides physically consistent predictions for out-of-range conditions, while the data-based model handles normal operating conditions with high execution speed. This merging resolves the contradiction by leveraging the strengths of both approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a data reconciliation layer as an intermediary that validates and harmonizes predictions from both data-based and physics-based models. This mediator ensures that predictions remain accurate across all operating conditions while maintaining the execution speed benefits of data-based models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a physics-based model is used for predictions, then reliability is improved, but computation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using physics-based models only when necessary (for out-of-range conditions or validation), rather than continuously. For normal operating conditions, the system relies on faster data-based models, thus reducing overall computation time while maintaining reliability where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the prediction process into different operational zones: data-based models handle normal operating ranges, while physics-based models handle out-of-range conditions. This segmentation reduces computation time by avoiding unnecessary physics-based calculations during normal operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If a data-based model is trained on historical data, then adaptability is improved, but data quality requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel adaptabilityVSAvoiddata quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where predictions from the hybrid model are validated against physical principles and historical data. This feedback loop identifies and corrects data quality issues, allowing the system to maintain adaptability while reducing the stringency of data quality requirements through continuous validation and refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If existing hybrid models are used, then integration of data-based and physics-based models is achieved, but real-time accuracy deteriorates due to inadequate feature extraction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel integrationVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary feature extraction and data reconciliation before the main prediction process. By pre-processing and validating features in advance, the system achieves both real-time accuracy and proper model integration, resolving the contradiction between integration capability and prediction precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12190029B2Self-service artificial intelligence platform leveraging data-based and physics-based models for providing real-time controls and recommendations
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 BERT LABS PTE LTD
  • US12190029B2 patent drawing
  • US12190029B2 patent drawing
  • US12190029B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to development of a self-service artificial intelligence platform by integrating data-based model with physics-based model and vice-versa to generate real-time recommendations and control actions. Further, the present disclosure provides the system and method for at least one of data collection and preparation, developing a hybrid system/control model, and developing a physics-based model driven by data-based model and vice versa to generate real-time recommendations and control actions.