Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface Using Eye Tracking for Faster Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing brain-computer interface (BCI) technologies face challenges in achieving high-speed and accurate user interactions, particularly in real-world environments, due to low information transfer rates, high error rates, and complex interaction interfaces, which demand a need for improved devices and techniques that facilitate natural and intuitive user manipulation of machines.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid BCI system integrating real-time eye-movement tracking with brain activity monitoring, utilizing a video-based eye-tracker and neural recording headset, to enable high-speed and accurate user interactions through a hardware-agnostic interface that includes pointing and action control features, such as gaze detection and neural signal analysis, to mediate user interaction with machines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional BCI systems use brain signals alone for control, then communication capabilities are provided for disabled users, but interaction speed is limited to about 2 characters per minute

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication capabilityVSAvoidinteraction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple signal sources (brain signals, eye-tracking, and other physiological signals) into a hybrid BCI system. This merging of different input modalities allows the system to achieve both high communication capability for disabled users and high interaction speed, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If BCI systems are designed for assistive technology, then access to operating machines is provided, but interaction accuracy and error rates are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess capabilityVSAvoidinteraction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors multiple signal sources and adjusts its interpretation accordingly. This feedback loop allows the system to maintain high adaptability for different users and applications while improving interaction accuracy by detecting and correcting errors in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes parameters such as signal weighting, threshold values, and processing algorithms based on the user's state and task requirements. This allows the BCI to adapt to different users and situations while maintaining high interaction accuracy through optimized parameter selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Extent of automation

If BCI systems use complex interaction interfaces, then control capabilities are enhanced, but user cognitive load and interface complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol capabilityVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service mechanisms where the system automatically selects and switches between different input modalities based on the task at hand. The hybrid BCI system autonomously determines which signal source (brain, eye-tracking, or other physiological signals) is most appropriate for the current interaction, reducing the cognitive load on users while maintaining enhanced control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If BCI systems operate in real-world environments, then practical usability is improved, but signal quality and interaction accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepractical usabilityVSAvoidsignal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple signal sources and processing methods to compensate for the degradation of individual signals in real-world environments. By merging brain signals, eye-tracking data, and other physiological signals, the system maintains high measurement precision and interaction accuracy even when operating in practical, real-world settings rather than controlled laboratory environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP3710915B1Brain-computer interface with adaptations for high-speed, accurate, and intuitive user interactions
Publication Date: 2025.12.31 NEURABLE INC
  • EP3710915B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3710915B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3710915B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3C

AI summary

Embodiments described herein relate to systems, devices, and methods for use in the implementation of a brain-computer interface that integrates real-time eye-movement tracking with brain activity tracking to present and update a user interface that is strategically designed for high speed and accuracy of human -machine interaction. Embodiments described herein also relate to the implementation of a hardware agnostic brain-computer interface with specific user interface adaptations to enable high-speed, intuitive, and accurate user manipulation of applications and/or machines.