Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface for Fast, Accurate Intent Decoding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing brain-computer interface (BCI) technologies face challenges in achieving high-speed and accurate user interactions, requiring improved information transfer rates, reduced error rates, and simplified interaction interfaces to transition from laboratory environments to real-world applications.

Innovation Solution

A hardware-agnostic BCI system integrating eye-movement and brain activity tracking to facilitate real-time user interface control, utilizing eye-tracking devices and neural recording headsets to capture oculomotor and neural signals, processing them to determine user intent for intuitive and accurate interaction with machines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional BCI systems use slow signal processing methods, then measurement precision is improved, but speed of interaction deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of user intent detectionVSAvoidinteraction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the interaction process into distinct phases: eye movement tracking for pointing control, signal acquisition for intent detection, and action execution. This segmentation allows optimized processing in each phase, achieving both speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary eye movement tracking to determine pointing location before acquiring and processing neural signals for intent detection. This preliminary action reduces the processing burden during critical decision-making, enabling faster overall interaction while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If BCI systems integrate multiple signal types, then accuracy of user intent determination is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of user intent detectionVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges eye movement tracking and neural signal processing into a unified BCI framework where both modalities work together. Eye tracking provides pointing control while neural signals provide intent detection, creating a complementary system that achieves high accuracy without excessive complexity through coordinated integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses an intermediary processing layer that receives inputs from both eye tracking and neural signal sources, integrates them according to the hybrid BCI model, and produces unified control commands. This intermediary layer manages the complexity of multi-signal integration while maintaining system coherence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If BCI systems use traditional input interfaces, then ease of operation is maintained, but information transfer rate deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interface usabilityVSAvoidinformation transfer rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces traditional mechanical input interfaces (mouse, keyboard) with a hybrid BCI system that directly interprets user intent through eye movements and neural signals. This substitution eliminates the need for manual manipulation while achieving high information transfer rates through direct brain-computer communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the fundamental parameters of interaction by measuring eye movement velocity, acceleration, and neural signal characteristics to determine user intent. These parameter-based measurements enable rapid information transfer while maintaining ease of operation through natural, intuitive control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3740126B1Brain-computer interface with adaptations for high-speed, accurate, and intuitive user interactions
Publication Date: 2026.04.01 NEURABLE INC
  • EP3740126B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3740126B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3740126B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3D

AI summary

Embodiments described herein relate to systems, devices, and methods for use in the implementation of a brain-computer interface that tracks brain activity, with or without additional sensors providing additional sources of information, while presenting and updating a User Interface/User Experience that is strategically designed for high speed and accuracy of human - machine interaction. Embodiments described herein also relate to the implementation of a hardware agnostic brain-computer interface that uses neural signals to mediate user manipulation of machines and devices.