Hybrid Button with Reverse Flange for Anti-Rotation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional center-mounted buttons on media players, such as iPods, face challenges in maintaining design functionality and anti-rotation features while achieving a non-plastic cosmetic finish and a concave shape within manufacturing specifications.

Innovation Solution

A button is manufactured using a combination of CNC-lathed non-plastic and injection-molded plastic components, where the non-plastic upper portion is anodized and features a reverse flange to securely attach the plastic lower portion, allowing for improved strength, reliability, and cosmetic properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If a button is formed wholly from plastic using conventional manufacturing techniques, then it can be easily manufactured with anti-rotation features, but it cannot achieve a non-plastic cosmetic finish or concave shape within design specifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcave shapeVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The button is divided into two distinct portions: a non-plastic upper portion (formed by CNC lathing) and a plastic lower portion (injection-molded). This segmentation allows each portion to be manufactured using the most suitable process for its material and functional requirements, resolving the contradiction between achieving non-plastic cosmetic finish and maintaining ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The button combines two different materials (non-plastic material and plastic material) into a single composite structure. This allows the upper portion to provide the desired non-plastic cosmetic finish and concave shape while the lower portion provides structural support and is manufactured using conventional injection molding techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If a button is formed from plastic, then it can be manufactured with anti-rotation features, but it cannot provide improved strength, reliability, and electrical properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability and strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The button is segmented into a non-plastic upper portion that provides improved strength, reliability, and electrical properties, and a plastic lower portion that is easier to manufacture with standard mold tools. The reverse flange structure enables secure attachment between the two portions while maintaining manufacturing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the button have different material properties tailored to their specific functions: the upper portion uses non-plastic material for strength and electrical conductivity where needed, while the lower portion uses plastic for ease of manufacture and structural support. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between reliability and manufacturing ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Shape

If a button is formed from plastic, then it can be manufactured cost-effectively, but it cannot provide a metallic or non-plastic cosmetic finish

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecosmetic finishVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The button is segmented so that only the upper cosmetic portion is made from non-plastic material requiring CNC lathing and anodizing, while the lower structural portion is injection-molded from plastic. This segmentation limits the use of expensive processes to only where cosmetic appearance is critical, resolving the contradiction between cosmetic finish and production cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The non-plastic material with metallic cosmetic finish is applied locally to the upper portion where appearance matters most, while the lower portion uses cost-effective plastic material. This local quality differentiation allows the product to achieve desired cosmetic appearance without incurring high costs throughout the entire button structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The hybrid button design retains anti-rotation functionality, provides a concave surface, and enhances the aesthetic and functional reliability of the button, while being cost-effective for high-volume production.

Implementation Method 1

anodizing the non-plastic upper portion following the forming of the non-plastic upper portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAnodizing: Anodising

Data Source

PatentUS8044314B2Hybrid button
Publication Date: 2011.10.25 APPLE INC
  • US8044314B2 patent drawing
  • US8044314B2 patent drawing
  • US8044314B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hybrid button according to the invention is provided. In one embodiment, the button can be implemented in an electronic device such as a media player. The button can include a metal or other non-plastic portion having a reverse flange and a plastic portion including anti-rotation legs. The legs can prevent rotation at least in part because they are retained by another structure. The plastic portion can be injection-molded onto the reverse flange of the metal or non-plastic portion. As such, the reverse flange fixes the position of the plastic portion with respect to the metal portion. Finally, the metal portion can include an actuator nub that actuates a switch when the button is depressed.