Hybrid Cellulosic Plastic Clamshell Container Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional clamshell containers made of single materials like paperboard, plastic, or Styrofoam face issues with sturdiness, recyclability, and waste generation, as they lack versatility and environmental friendliness.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid clamshell container design featuring a cellulosic base and a plastic cover, allowing for separate manufacturing and configuration of components to enhance strength, durability, and recyclability, while reducing biodegradable waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a single material (paperboard, plastic, or Styrofoam) is used to make the container, then the manufacturing cost is low and ease of manufacture is good, but the container lacks sturdiness for display and transport

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesturdinessVSAvoidcontainer structure
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining paperboard (cellulosic material) for the base with plastic for the cover. The paperboard base provides structural strength and stacking capability, while the plastic cover provides durability and protection. This composite structure resolves the contradiction by achieving the desired sturdiness without excessive complexity, as the materials are integrated into a unified container design rather than separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The container is segmented into distinct components: a paperboard base and a plastic cover. This segmentation allows each material to be optimized for its specific function - the paperboard base for structural integrity and the plastic cover for protection - while maintaining overall container functionality. The segmented design enables separate manufacturing and assembly, reducing overall complexity compared to monolithic structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If plastic or Styrofoam is used to make the container, then the container is more durable and strong, but it produces undesirable waste and is more costly to recycle

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidwaste generation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using different materials for different parts of the container based on their specific functional requirements. The paperboard base provides structural durability where needed, while the plastic cover provides protection where required. This localized material selection optimizes performance while minimizing harmful waste, as the paperboard component is more recyclable and biodegradable compared to full plastic construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The composite structure combines recyclable paperboard with plastic in a way that prioritizes environmental sustainability. The paperboard base, being cellulosic and recyclable, reduces harmful waste compared to entirely plastic containers. The plastic cover provides necessary durability while the overall design emphasizes recyclability through the prominent paperboard component, addressing both reliability and waste generation concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of manufacture

If paperboard is used to make the container, then the container is easily recyclable, but it lacks the desired sturdiness for display and transport

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverecyclabilityVSAvoidsturdiness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials to maintain the recyclability advantage of paperboard while compensating for its weakness in sturdiness. The paperboard base remains easily recyclable and biodegradable, preserving the environmental benefits. The plastic cover reinforces the structure, providing the necessary sturdiness for display and transport. This composite approach resolves the contradiction by keeping the primary structural material (paperboard) recyclable while adding reinforcement where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

By segmenting the container into a paperboard base and plastic cover, the design maintains the recyclability of the paperboard component while adding structural strength through the plastic cover. The segmentation allows the paperboard to be easily separated and recycled independently, preserving its recyclability advantage, while the plastic cover provides the necessary sturdiness for handling and display.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Strength

If a hybrid design with separate base and cover is used, then the container's strength and durability are improved, but the manufacturing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The container is segmented into a paperboard base and plastic cover that can be manufactured separately using optimized processes for each material. The paperboard base can be formed through conventional paperboard forming techniques, while the plastic cover can be molded using plastic injection molding. This segmentation simplifies the overall manufacturing process by allowing each component to be produced independently using the most efficient method for its material, rather than requiring complex integrated manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The composite material design allows for specialized manufacturing processes tailored to each material's properties. The paperboard base can be manufactured using paperboard-specific processes that optimize its structural properties, while the plastic cover can be manufactured using plastic molding processes that maximize durability. This material-specific process optimization resolves the contradiction by maintaining ease of manufacture through specialized techniques while achieving superior overall strength through the composite structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS20250019117A1Containters, blanks for containers and methods for forming containers and packaging product
Publication Date: 2025.01.16 WESTROCK PACKAGING SYSTEMS LLC
  • US20250019117A1 patent drawing
  • US20250019117A1 patent drawing
  • US20250019117A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A container includes a base that includes a bottom wall and side walls. The container also includes a cover that is coupled to and that is hingedly movable relative to a first side wall of the side walls between an open configuration and a closed configuration. The cover is releasably connected to at least a second side wall of the side walls in the closed configuration.