Hybrid Channelizer Architecture for Flexible Radio Reception

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional FDMA receiver designs are resource-intensive and power-consuming due to high sample rate processing, and they are limited in flexibility regarding carrier frequencies and symbol rates, especially when dealing with a large number of channels with varying bandwidths and sampling rates.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid channelizer architecture using multiple polyphase FFT filter banks and additional channelizer modules that reduce hardware and power requirements by processing signals at full sampling rates, allowing flexible selection of carrier frequencies and symbol rates through staggered sub-bands with overlap, enabling decoding of channels with arbitrary center frequencies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional FDMA receiver designs process signals at high sample rates, then decoding accuracy is maintained, but hardware resource requirements and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The receiver divides the wideband signal processing into multiple polyphase filter banks, each handling a specific frequency sub-band. This segmentation allows parallel processing at lower individual sample rates while maintaining overall high-resolution decoding capability across the full bandwidth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from time-domain sampling to frequency-domain processing by applying polyphase filter banks. This dimensional change from temporal to spectral processing enables efficient resource allocation and reduced power consumption while preserving decoding accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If traditional channelizers use a single uniform processing architecture, then hardware complexity is reduced, but flexibility in selecting carrier frequencies and symbol rates is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware complexityVSAvoidflexibility in carrier frequency selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The polyphase filter bank architecture serves multiple functions: it provides frequency decomposition, enables flexible channel selection, and supports various symbol rates. This universal structure replaces multiple specialized channelizers, reducing overall hardware complexity while enhancing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The switch network dynamically connects different filter bank outputs to channelizer modules based on the desired carrier frequencies and symbol rates. This dynamic reconfiguration capability allows the system to adapt to various channel configurations without requiring dedicated hardware for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If polyphase filter banks are used to process wideband signals, then processing efficiency at high sample rates is improved, but limitations remain in flexible channel selection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidchannel selection flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The switch network acts as an intermediary between the polyphase filter banks and the channelizer modules. It enables flexible channel selection by dynamically routing appropriate filter bank outputs to the required channelizers, thereby overcoming the fixed channel limitations of traditional polyphase systems while preserving their processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple polyphase filter banks with overlapping sub-bands are used, then flexibility in channel frequency selection increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel frequency flexibilityVSAvoidnumber of filter banks
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple polyphase filter banks with overlapping sub-bands are combined in parallel, with a switch network that intelligently selects and routes the appropriate sub-band to each channelizer. This merging approach achieves comprehensive frequency coverage and flexible channel selection while managing complexity through systematic organization and control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10230407B2Radio receiver with hybrid channelizer architecture
Publication Date: 2019.03.12 HUGHES NETWORK SYST
  • US10230407B2 patent drawing
  • US10230407B2 patent drawing
  • US10230407B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for a radio receiver with a hybrid channelizer architecture. In some implementations, a receiver includes an input to receive a first signal encoding digital samples of a radiofrequency signal. The receiver includes a frequency shifter configured to generate a second signal that is frequency shifted relative to the first signal. The receiver includes a first polyphase filter bank configured to receive the first signal and provide filter bank outputs for first sub-bands. The receiver includes a second polyphase filter bank configured to receive the second signal and provide filter bank outputs for second sub-bands. The receiver includes a switch network configured to select among the filter bank outputs and provide the filter bank outputs to respective digital channelizer modules for multiple channels.