Hybrid Computational Storage with Local Commodity Microcontrollers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computational storage devices are cumbersome and expensive, often relying on high-cost FPGAs that consume excessive energy and are difficult to program, and they struggle with data movement bottlenecks and complex programming environments, especially for data-intensive tasks like exploratory data science and artificial intelligence workloads.

Innovation Solution

A computational storage system with integrated computational acceleration, a memory subsystem, and a host, utilizing commodity microcontrollers to manage storage and reduce data movement by enabling object-focused computation locally, thereby simplifying programming and reducing energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If FPGA-based computational storage systems are used, then computational capability is improved, but device cost and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the hardware parameter from FPGA to commodity microcontroller, transforming the computational storage device from a high-performance but high-consumption system to a low-cost, low-power system that still provides adequate computational capability for storage-related tasks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive FPGAs with inexpensive commodity microcontrollers, accepting that the computational capability may be less versatile but sufficient for storage-specific workloads, thereby dramatically reducing device cost and energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Adaptability or versatility

If FPGA-based computational storage systems are used, then computational capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational capabilityVSAvoidprogramming complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses commodity microcontrollers with well-documented, standardized programming interfaces instead of FPGAs, which require complex hardware description languages and specialized knowledge, thereby simplifying the programming environment and reducing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs commodity microcontrollers that have universal programming interfaces and can be programmed using standard C/C++ compilers, making them accessible to a broader range of developers and simplifying the overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If data is moved from storage subsystem to host for processing, then computational capability is improved, but data movement time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational capabilityVSAvoiddata movement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the computational functions with the storage subsystem by integrating a microcontroller directly into the storage device, allowing data processing to occur locally at the storage location rather than requiring data movement to the host, thereby eliminating data movement time for processing operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The storage subsystem performs computational tasks autonomously through the integrated microcontroller, processing data locally without requiring host intervention or data transfer, thereby reducing data movement time and enabling self-sufficient computational operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Adaptability or versatility

If data is moved from storage subsystem to host for processing, then computational capability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines storage and computation in a single subsystem, allowing data processing to occur locally without energy-intensive data transfers across system boundaries, thereby reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining computational capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The storage subsystem independently performs computational tasks using its integrated microcontroller, eliminating the need to transfer data to the host for processing, thereby reducing the energy consumption associated with data movement and host-side processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12353763B2Hybrid commodity computational storage devices
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 GEM STATE INFORMATICS INC
  • US12353763B2 patent drawing
  • US12353763B2 patent drawing
  • US12353763B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computational storage system includes a computational storage subsystem having a controller and a storage. The controller is configured to receive a work chunk from a host. The work chunk includes identification of an executable object and identification of a data object. The controller is further configured to locate the data object in the storage via the identification of the data object, obtain a copy of the data object in a memory of the controller, execute functions in the executable object on the data object in the memory of the controller to generate a result object, and convey the result object to a destination of the computational storage system.