Hybrid Vehicle Driving Pattern Prediction Using Event-Specific Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for predicting a driver's behavior in hybrid vehicles fail to accurately reflect individual driving patterns, leading to inefficient predictions due to the averaging of diverse driving styles and events, resulting in suboptimal engine and motor control.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for predicting a driving pattern in hybrid vehicles that involves acquiring current driving information, determining upcoming events and driving styles, and generating acceleration/deceleration predictions using pre-learned models, incorporating sensors and machine-learning algorithms to tailor predictions to specific drivers and events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single prediction model is generated based on acquisition of driving data of a plurality of drivers and learning of the drivers' patterns, then the prediction system can be simplified and easier to implement, but prediction accuracy greatly varies depending on drivers' peculiarities and cannot accurately predict individual driving behavior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction model structureVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single prediction model into multiple event-specific prediction models (first prediction model for speed camera events, second prediction model for tollgate events, third prediction model for intersection events). Each model is specialized for a particular type of event, allowing accurate prediction of individual driving behavior for different situations while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different prediction models based on the specific type of upcoming event detected. Instead of using a uniform model for all situations, the system selects and applies the appropriate specialized model (first, second, or third prediction model) according to the event type, ensuring locally optimized prediction accuracy for each event category.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If learning of driving pattern is conducted based on samples derived from multiple drivers with different behaviors (e.g., driver A decelerates in advance before speed camera, driver B decelerates suddenly), then more diverse driving patterns can be covered, but the calculated prediction result merely corresponds to an intermediate value that is a simple mean value and is not suitable for either driver

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of driving patternsVSAvoidprediction accuracy for individual drivers
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the learning process into event-specific learning tasks. Each prediction model (first, second, third) is trained separately on driving data corresponding to its specific event type. This allows the system to capture the full range of individual driving behaviors for each event type without averaging them out, as each model learns the peculiarities of drivers' responses to that specific event type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the learning parameters by creating separate prediction models for different event types rather than using a single model with averaged parameters. Each model has its own learned parameters specific to its event type, allowing the system to adapt to diverse driving patterns while maintaining high prediction accuracy for individual drivers in each situation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If a prediction model is generated from one driver's data (e.g., driver who decelerates suddenly at tollgate but in advance at speed camera), then the model can be simpler and faster to compute, but it cannot accurately predict driving behavior for different types of events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputation speedVSAvoidprediction accuracy for different events
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the prediction task into multiple specialized models, each trained on data from multiple drivers for a specific event type. This segmentation allows each model to be computationally efficient (dealing with one event type at a time) while collectively providing comprehensive coverage and high accuracy across all event types through the ensemble of specialized models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10632985B2Hybrid vehicle and method of predicting driving pattern in the same
Publication Date: 2020.04.28 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US10632985B2 patent drawing
  • US10632985B2 patent drawing
  • US10632985B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a hybrid vehicle and a method of predicting a driving pattern in the same. The method includes: acquiring current vehicle driving information, determining an upcoming event and a driving style based on the current vehicle driving information, and generating an acceleration/deceleration prediction value based on a prediction model corresponding to the upcoming event and the driving style selected from a plurality of pre-learned prediction models.