Hybrid Powertrain Engine Operating Point Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hybrid powertrain systems face challenges in optimizing engine operation to balance operator power requests with energy storage device state of charge, leading to inefficiencies in fuel economy and battery charging.

Innovation Solution

A method that monitors operator power requests and energy storage device state of charge to determine the most cost-effective engine operating points, allowing the engine and electric machine to communicate tractive power through a transmission device, optimizing torque and rotational speed control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the engine operates to meet operator power requests, then power delivery is improved, but fuel economy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower deliveryVSAvoidfuel economy
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts engine operating points based on real-time conditions including operator power requests and battery state of charge. The control system continuously optimizes the balance between engine power output and fuel consumption by selecting from multiple candidate operating points, allowing the system to adapt to varying driving conditions and energy storage levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The method evaluates multiple candidate engine operating points with different parameters (torque, speed, fuel consumption) and selects the optimal operating point based on current system state. By changing engine operating parameters dynamically rather than maintaining fixed settings, the system achieves both adequate power delivery and improved fuel economy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Power

If the engine operates at high power output, then operator power requests are met, but battery charging efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoidbattery charging efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The control system proactively manages battery charge levels by evaluating candidate operating points that consider future charging needs. Before battery charge becomes critical, the system selects operating points that optimize both power delivery and battery charging, preventing energy depletion and ensuring sustained operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors battery state of charge and uses this feedback to adjust engine operating point selection. When battery charge levels change, the control system re-evaluates candidate operating points to maintain optimal balance between meeting power requests and maintaining battery charging efficiency, creating a closed-loop control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2065272B1Method for operating an engine in a hybrid powertrain system
Publication Date: 2013.04.03 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • EP2065272B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2065272B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2065272B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An engine (14) and an electric machine (56,72) are operative to communicate tractive power with a transmission device (10) to control output power to an output member (64). The electric machine (56,72) is electrically coupled to an energy storage device (74). A method for controlling the engine (14) and electric machine (56,72) includes monitoring an operator request for power, monitoring a state of charge of the energy storage device (74), determining an operating cost for each of a plurality of candidate engine operating points based on the operator request for power and the state of charge of the energy storage device (74); and operating the engine (14) at the candidate engine operating point having a preferred operating cost.