Hybrid EV Mode Control for Passenger Boarding and Drop-Off

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) used in applications like school buses, which experience frequent passenger boarding and exiting, require specialized control strategies to optimize fuel efficiency and safety, as existing control methods do not adequately account for the unique driving conditions of such vehicles.

Innovation Solution

An HEV system that includes a controller determining the boarding or leaving state of passengers based on location and internal vehicle information, allowing the vehicle to switch between pick-up and drop-off driving modes, and controlling the vehicle's powertrain accordingly to optimize energy usage and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a conventional control strategy is used for HEVs, then the vehicle can operate in EV mode and HEV mode with basic mode switching, but it cannot optimize fuel efficiency and safety for specific repetitive passenger scenarios like school buses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to repetitive passenger scenariosVSAvoidcontrol strategy complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control strategy dynamically adjusts operating modes based on real-time detection of boarding and leaving states. The system transitions between EV mode, HEV mode, and engine-off state depending on whether passengers are boarding or leaving, making the control adaptable to repetitive passenger scenarios without requiring a fixed complex structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from vehicle sensors to detect boarding and leaving states, then adjusts the operating mode accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables the control strategy to adapt to repetitive passenger scenarios automatically, improving versatility without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Use of energy by moving object

If the vehicle operates in EV mode to improve fuel efficiency, then energy consumption is reduced, but the battery state of charge may become insufficient for repeated acceleration during pick-up and drop-off operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidbattery state of charge sufficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control strategy implements periodic charging cycles during stopping periods when passengers are boarding or leaving. The engine operates periodically to charge the battery during these idle periods, ensuring sufficient state of charge is maintained for the next acceleration cycle while still allowing EV mode operation during driving to maintain fuel efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary charging of the battery during stopping periods before the next acceleration is needed. By charging the battery in advance during idle time when passengers are boarding or leaving, the system ensures sufficient energy is available for the next pick-up or drop-off operation without compromising overall fuel efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Object-generated harmful factors

If the engine is stopped to reduce emissions and noise during passenger boarding and exiting, then environmental impact is reduced, but the vehicle may not respond quickly enough when sudden acceleration is needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions and noiseVSAvoidacceleration response speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary engine startup during stopping periods when passengers are boarding or leaving. By starting the engine in advance during these idle periods, the vehicle is prepared for quick acceleration when needed, while still maintaining low emissions and noise during the actual passenger boarding and exiting operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Use of energy by moving object

If mode switching is performed frequently to optimize energy usage during pick-up and drop-off operations, then fuel efficiency is improved, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy usage optimizationVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically switches between EV mode, HEV mode, and engine-off state based on real-time detection of boarding and leaving states. This dynamic approach optimizes energy usage by selecting the most efficient mode for each operational phase without requiring a permanently complex control structure, as the complexity is only activated when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240190438A1Hybrid electric vehicle and method of controlling the same
Publication Date: 2024.06.13 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20240190438A1 patent drawing
  • US20240190438A1 patent drawing
  • US20240190438A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A hybrid electric vehicle includes an engine, a drive motor, and a controller configured to determine a boarding state or a leaving state of a passenger, to allow a vehicle to enter a first mode for pick-up driving or a second mode for drop-off driving, and to control the vehicle based on the entered mode and the boarding or leaving state after the entering, and a method of controlling the same.