Hybrid-Scale Fiber Matrix Particles for Tissue Integration and Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing surgical meshes and materials face issues such as excessive fibrosis, scarification, immune reactions, poor tissue integration, limited mechanical strength, and biocompatibility, leading to complications like post-operative pain, adhesions, and infections, while nanofiber materials lack sufficient tensile strength and cellular ingrowth.

Innovation Solution

Development of a non-woven graft material composed of hybrid-scale fiber matrices with distinct fiber compositions, including poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) and polydioxanone, which are electrospun and processed into particles for improved mechanical strength, cellular integration, and biocompatibility, suitable for wound healing and tissue repair.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If higher fiber densities are used to improve mechanical strength, then tensile strength and tear resistance are improved, but cellular ingrowth and tissue integration are decreased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidcellular ingrowth
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating regions of different fiber densities within the same mesh structure. High-density regions provide mechanical strength where needed, while low-density regions facilitate cellular ingrowth and tissue integration. This spatial variation in fiber density allows the mesh to simultaneously satisfy both mechanical support requirements and biological integration requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials by combining fibers of different compositions, sizes, and densities within a single mesh structure. The composite nature allows different regions to perform different functions - some areas optimized for strength while others optimized for cell infiltration and tissue integration, resolving the contradiction between mechanical properties and biological compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If higher fiber densities are used to improve mechanical strength, then tear resistance is improved, but tissue integration is decreased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetear resistanceVSAvoidtissue integration
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mesh structure incorporates local quality variations with high-density fiber regions providing tear resistance while adjacent low-density regions enable tissue integration. This localized differentiation allows the material to simultaneously achieve high mechanical reliability and effective biological integration without compromising either property.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If synthetic materials are used to improve mechanical strength, then structural integrity is improved, but fibrosis and scarification are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidfibrosis
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite materials combining synthetic and biologic components in a single mesh structure. The synthetic portions provide structural integrity and mechanical strength, while the biologic portions reduce fibrosis and scarification by promoting favorable tissue integration. This composite approach allows the mesh to deliver both mechanical performance and biocompatibility simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the chemical composition and physical properties of different regions within the mesh. By varying fiber composition, diameter, and density across different zones, the material achieves optimal balance between structural integrity and reduced fibrotic response, with synthetic regions providing strength and biologic regions minimizing scarification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If biologic materials are used to improve tissue integration, then cellular compatibility is improved, but immune reactions are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue integrationVSAvoidimmune reactions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The mesh uses composite materials where biologic components enhance tissue integration and cellular compatibility while synthetic components provide structural support and reduce immune reactivity. This composite strategy allows the material to achieve effective biological integration without triggering excessive immune responses that would compromise patient outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

5Adaptability or versatility

If nanofiber materials are used to improve biocompatibility, then cellular compatibility is improved, but mechanical strength is decreased

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebiocompatibilityVSAvoidtensile strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating nanofiber regions for biocompatibility and strength regions for mechanical support within the same mesh. The nanofiber portions provide excellent cellular compatibility and biocompatibility, while the stronger fiber regions ensure adequate tensile strength for surgical handling and implantation, resolving the contradiction between biocompatibility and mechanical performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The mesh employs composite materials combining nanofibers with higher-strength fibers. The nanofiber components deliver superior biocompatibility and cellular interaction, while the complementary high-strength fibers provide the necessary tensile strength, creating a material that satisfies both biological and mechanical requirements simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The hybrid-scale fiber matrices provide enhanced mechanical strength, tissue integration, and biocompatibility, reducing complications and promoting wound healing by maintaining structural integrity and supporting cellular growth.

Implementation Method 1

nanofiber or hybrid-scale fiber matrix materials... formed by electrospinning a first fiber composition and a second fiber composition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrospinning: Electrohydrodynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260034264A1Particle-form hybrid-scale fiber matrix
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 SOLVENTUM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES CO
  • US20260034264A1 patent drawing
  • US20260034264A1 patent drawing
  • US20260034264A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Particles of non-woven graft materials for use in specialized surgical procedures such as soft tissue repair and wound management procedures, methods for making the powder, and methods for repairing tissue such as neurological tissue using the powder are disclosed. The particles can advantageously be used to fill irregular shaped areas or can be used in conjunction with non-woven graft materials.