Hybrid 3D Grid Solvation Analysis for Ionic Solutions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current atomistic simulations require explicit solvent models for accurate solvation free energy analysis, which are computationally costly and inefficient, especially when simulating ionic solutions due to the significantly smaller number of simulated ions compared to water molecules, making it infeasible to obtain spatially resolved thermodynamic properties.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using hybrid or mixed spatial resolution techniques with different 3D grids for ionic and nonionic solvent molecules in MD simulations, allowing for computationally feasible analysis of solvation free energies by defining separate spatial resolutions for polar and ionic solvent molecules, enabling the determination of thermodynamic and structural parameters and generating 3D solvation free energy maps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If explicit solvent simulations are used to accurately model solvation free energies and solvent-mediated interactions, then the accuracy of thermodynamic properties is improved, but the computational cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of solvation free energyVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the solvent analysis into two distinct components: nonionic solvent molecules (water) and ionic solvent molecules (ions). Each component is analyzed separately with appropriate spatial resolution, allowing efficient computation while maintaining accuracy for both solvent types in electrolytic solutions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different spatial resolutions to different regions of the simulation box: high spatial resolution is applied to nonionic solvent molecules where detailed hydrogen bonding networks require fine sampling, while lower spatial resolution is applied to ionic solvent molecules where long-range electrostatic effects dominate. This local differentiation optimizes computational resources while preserving accuracy where needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If high spatial resolution is used for all solvent molecules to obtain detailed thermodynamic properties, then the precision of solvation analysis is improved, but the simulation time becomes infeasibly long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolution of thermodynamic propertiesVSAvoidsimulation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by assigning different spatial resolutions to different solvent components based on their physical characteristics. Nonionic solvent molecules receive high spatial resolution (e.g., 0.5-1.0 Å grid spacing) to capture hydrogen bonding details, while ionic solvent molecules use lower spatial resolution (e.g., 2.0-5.0 Å grid spacing) sufficient for electrostatic field analysis, dramatically reducing total computation time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the spatial resolution application into separate analysis passes: first analyzing nonionic solvent molecules with high resolution to obtain detailed solvation structure, then analyzing ionic solvent molecules with lower resolution to obtain electrostatic contributions, combining results for complete solvation free energy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If the number of simulated ions is increased to improve sampling statistics, then the accuracy of ionic solvent contributions is improved, but the computational cost scales linearly and becomes prohibitive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of ionic solvent contributionVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses copying by creating multiple replicas of the simulation system with different random seeds and initial configurations. Instead of increasing the number of ions in a single simulation, multiple copies of the system are simulated with fewer ions each, and results are averaged to improve statistical accuracy while maintaining computational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by adjusting the spatial resolution and sampling intervals for ionic solvent analysis. By using lower spatial resolution grids and strategic sampling of ion positions, the patent achieves adequate statistical accuracy for ionic contributions without requiring prohibitively large numbers of simulated ions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20210398620A1Methods, systems, and computer readable media for analyzing simulated solvent-mediated molecular interactions
Publication Date: 2021.12.23 THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF ARIZONA
  • US20210398620A1 patent drawing
  • US20210398620A1 patent drawing
  • US20210398620A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein are methods of analyzing simulated solvent-mediated molecular interactions. The methods include defining a plurality of three-dimensional (3D) grids of voxels on simulated target molecules solvated with simulated solvent molecules to produce a 3D simulation structure. The simulated solvent molecules include simulated nonionic solvent molecules and simulated ionic solvent molecules. A first 3D grid of the plurality of 3D grids includes a first spatial resolution and is defined on the simulated nonionic solvent molecules. A second 3D grid of the plurality of 3D grids includes a second spatial resolution that differs from the first spatial resolution and is defined on the simulated ionic solvent molecules. Related systems and computer readable media are also provided.