Hybrid Growing Environment With AI Crop Feedback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) systems face challenges such as high risk of crop failure, low product flexibility, and high operational costs due to mechanical dependence, while vertical farms struggle with inefficient use of space and resources.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid growing environment using mixed lighting, optimized climate control, and AI-driven sensor systems to adjust variables based on real-time plant growth stages and market demand, incorporating both vertical and horizontal space utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If vertical farming with densely packed crops and artificial lighting is implemented, then yield per square foot increases and water usage decreases, but capital expenditures and operational costs increase due to heavy mechanical dependence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield per square footVSAvoidmechanical dependence
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts lighting intensity and spectral composition based on real-time plant growth stage detection using computer vision. The lighting system transitions from static to adaptive control, modifying parameters such as photoperiod, intensity, and spectrum to match specific developmental phases of the plants, thereby optimizing growth while reducing energy waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements closed-loop feedback through continuous monitoring of plant health metrics using sensors and computer vision. Growth parameters such as leaf area, plant height, and biomass are measured and fed back to the control system, which automatically adjusts environmental conditions including lighting, temperature, and nutrient delivery to maintain optimal growth trajectories.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of substance

If controlled environment agriculture is implemented, then water usage and land area are reduced, but operational costs increase due to high capital expenditures and mechanical dependence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater usageVSAvoidoperational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs autonomous robotic platforms equipped with computer vision and AI to perform planting, monitoring, and harvesting operations. These self-service mechanisms reduce the need for manual labor and complex mechanical infrastructure, thereby lowering operational costs while maintaining the water-efficient benefits of controlled environment agriculture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Traditional mechanical irrigation and fertilization systems are replaced with precision delivery mechanisms controlled by sensor networks and AI algorithms. Nutrient solutions and water are delivered directly to plant roots based on real-time demand assessment, eliminating the need for extensive piping and mechanical distribution infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If traditional farming with plants spread apart is implemented, then plants have adequate growth space, but large amounts of unused white-space remain until maturity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplant growth spaceVSAvoidunused white-space
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from two-dimensional horizontal spacing to three-dimensional vertical stacking arrangements. Multiple layers of plants are cultivated at different heights within the same footprint, with each layer receiving customized lighting and environmental conditions. This dimensional transition eliminates unused space while providing adequate growth volume for each plant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Each plant or plant group receives customized environmental conditions tailored to its specific growth stage, species requirements, and positional characteristics. Lighting intensity, spectrum, temperature, and nutrient delivery are locally optimized for each zone rather than applying uniform conditions across the entire facility, maximizing space utilization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Device complexity

If fixed growing conditions are maintained in CEA, then environmental control is simplified, but product flexibility and adaptability to market demand decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental controlVSAvoidproduct flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically reconfigures environmental parameters including lighting schedules, temperature setpoints, humidity levels, and nutrient formulations in response to real-time plant growth stage detection and market demand signals. This enables flexible adaptation of crop varieties, growth rates, and harvest timing without requiring permanent infrastructure changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controlled environment facility is designed to support multiple crop types and growth modes within the same space. The system can switch between different plant species, vertical stacking configurations, and growing methodologies (such as hydroponics, aeroponics, or soil-based) using the same infrastructure, thereby maximizing product flexibility and market responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12557741B2Optimizing growing process in a hybrid growing environment using computer vision and artificial intelligence
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 LOCAL BOUNTI OPERATING CO LLC
  • US12557741B2 patent drawing
  • US12557741B2 patent drawing
  • US12557741B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for optimizing plant growth in a hybrid growing environment may implement artificial intelligence to measure and alter plant biometrics. Independent variables may be altered by a control unit by manipulating various control systems within the growing environment. Dependent variables may be measured, and the response of the dependent variables may be recorded in association with the alteration to the independent variables. A historical database may store data regarding the variables and may be referenced and updated by an exemplary embodiment. The control unit may optimize one or more variables or parameters based on a targeted value or outcome. An exemplary hybrid growing environment may include one or more vertical growing phases and a horizontal phase. The phases may implement various watering systems and may be hydroponic, be a complete CEA, use a mixture of natural, artificial, and/or supplemental lighting.