Hybrid LDPC Decoding With BP Control for Lower Power Reception

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing signal transmission methods using LDPC codes for erasure correction do not effectively manage calculation cost and power consumption in reception devices, leading to inefficient decoding processes.

Innovation Solution

A decoding device is introduced that combines BP decoding and maximum likelihood decoding, with a selector to choose between input signals processed by BP decoding and maximum likelihood decoding, optimizing calculation cost and power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If BP decoding and Gaussian elimination are combined without controlling decoding in consideration of calculation cost, then decoding accuracy is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control of the decoding process by introducing a termination determination unit that monitors decoding progress and decides when to stop BP decoding iterations. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to adapt the decoding effort based on actual performance needs, avoiding unnecessary computational iterations that would increase power consumption while maintaining adequate decoding accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of decoding iteration count by introducing a maximum number of iterations limit and a termination determination mechanism. By controlling the number of BP decoding iterations based on termination conditions, the system optimizes the balance between decoding accuracy and computational cost, thereby reducing power consumption without significantly compromising decoding performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If more powerful decoding methods are used to improve reception quality, then decoding performance is improved, but calculation cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereception qualityVSAvoidcalculation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using BP decoding with a controlled number of iterations rather than always applying the more computationally intensive Gaussian elimination. The termination determination unit allows the system to perform just enough decoding iterations to achieve acceptable performance, avoiding the excessive computational cost of full Gaussian elimination while maintaining adequate reception quality for many practical scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the decoding process into two distinct parts: BP decoding as the primary method with controlled iterations, and Gaussian elimination as a fallback for difficult cases. This segmentation allows the system to use the lighter BP decoding for most cases, reducing overall calculation cost, while still having the capability to switch to more powerful Gaussian elimination when necessary to maintain reception quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If Gaussian elimination is always applied to ensure decoding success, then decoding reliability is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding success rateVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by first attempting BP decoding with a controlled number of iterations before considering Gaussian elimination. This preliminary BP decoding step often suffices to achieve successful decoding, and only when it fails does the system proceed to the more time-consuming Gaussian elimination. This preliminary filtering significantly reduces the average processing time while maintaining high decoding success rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuity of useful action by implementing a hybrid decoding approach where BP decoding runs continuously with termination conditions, and Gaussian elimination is invoked only when necessary. This continuous monitoring and selective invocation ensures that the system achieves high decoding reliability without the constant overhead of always applying Gaussian elimination, thereby reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS10700811B2Transmission method, transmission device, reception method, and reception device
Publication Date: 2020.06.30 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD
  • US10700811B2 patent drawing
  • US10700811B2 patent drawing
  • US10700811B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A decoding device includes: a BP decoder that performs BP decoding on an input signal; a maximum likelihood decoder that performs maximum likelihood decoding on a signal subjected to the BP decoding; and a selector that selects one of the input signal, the signal subjected to the BP decoding, and a signal subjected to the maximum likelihood decoding. In a configuration of the decoding device, when a decoder is appropriately operated according to quality of data, a calculation scale can be reduced, and power consumption can be decreased.