Hybrid Machine Learning for Real-Time Compliance Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Complex network operations in computing environments face challenges such as scalability issues, high latency, and inefficiencies in executing compliance checks and updates, particularly in multi-country contribution services.

Innovation Solution

A computing architecture is implemented that utilizes distributed edge computing for data preprocessing, adaptive real-time machine learning models, and a hybrid neural network architecture to enhance predictive analytics and compliance forecasting, while integrating high-frequency external data sources and complex event processing engines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If batch processing models are used for compliance checks, then processing accuracy is maintained, but latency increases and timely execution is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance check accuracyVSAvoidprocessing latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static batch processing to dynamic stream processing, where compliance checks are performed in real-time as data streams through the system. The stream processing engine continuously monitors transactions and executes compliance rules immediately, enabling timely detection and response to compliance issues without waiting for periodic batch processing cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous compliance monitoring through stream processing, where compliance checks are performed continuously on incoming data streams rather than periodically. This ensures that compliance issues are detected and reported immediately as they occur, maintaining both accuracy and timeliness in the compliance evaluation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Productivity

If data storage and processing throughput is increased, then real-time processing capability is improved, but system complexity and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing throughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the compliance processing function into separate microservices, including a stream processing engine, a compliance rule engine, and a reporting service. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and scaled according to demand, improving throughput while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a stream processing engine as an intermediary layer between data sources and compliance checking components. This intermediary handles the high-volume data streaming and routing, abstracting complexity from the compliance rules engine and enabling efficient processing of large data volumes without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If manual intervention is used for feature engineering and model updates, then model accuracy can be maintained, but computational resources are consumed and adaptability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive model accuracyVSAvoidmodel adaptability to regulatory changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feature engineering and model updating through machine learning algorithms that continuously learn from new data and regulatory patterns. The system automatically detects changes in compliance behavior patterns and updates its predictive models without requiring manual retraining, enabling rapid adaptation to regulatory changes while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where compliance data and outcomes are continuously fed back into the machine learning models. This feedback mechanism enables the models to automatically learn from actual compliance behavior patterns and adjust their predictions, improving accuracy over time and adapting to evolving regulatory requirements without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250156772A1Network operation execution using hybrid machine learning
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 ADP INC
  • US20250156772A1 patent drawing
  • US20250156772A1 patent drawing
  • US20250156772A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system can identify data points associated with a profile data structure for a first time interval. The system can detect, from a data source, events indicative of modifying the data points associated with the profile data structure for a second time interval. The system can update, based on the events, one or more machine learning models of a hybrid machine learning model. The system can generate a predicted data point associated with the profile data structure based on the data points and the events being input into the hybrid machine learning model. The system can determine a variance in response to comparing the predicted data point for the second time interval to the data points identified for the first time interval. The system can transmit the variance to a payroll processing system to execute, for the second time interval, a network operation associated with the profile data structure.