Hybrid Machine Tool Heads for Additive Manufacturing QA

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine tools designed for milling are inadequate for additive manufacturing as they are primarily intended for shaping outward surfaces, failing to effectively manage the internal characteristics and microstructure of parts, and lack real-time quality assurance for surface topology, chemistry, and internal volume analysis.

Innovation Solution

A machine tool with movable processing heads capable of material removal and addition, equipped with interchangeable heads for various processes like milling, deposition, and inspection, and a clean/dirty side environment control system to maintain a sterile environment and manage heat, allowing for real-time monitoring and quality assurance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a machine tool designed for milling is used for additive manufacturing, then material removal capability is provided, but the machine cannot effectively manage internal characteristics and microstructure of parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal capabilityVSAvoidinternal characteristics control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The machine tool is designed with multi-functionality to perform both material removal (milling) and material addition (additive manufacturing) operations. The system incorporates interchangeable processing heads that can be selected based on the required operation, allowing the same machine to handle both subtractive and additive processes while maintaining control over internal characteristics and microstructure through integrated environmental management and real-time monitoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If a clean environment is maintained during additive manufacturing, then defect introduction is avoided, but system complexity increases due to environment control requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect preventionVSAvoidenvironment control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine tool environment is segmented into clean and dirty sides with separate controlled zones. The clean side houses the additive manufacturing workspace with controlled atmosphere, while the dirty side contains material storage and handling areas. This segmentation allows maintenance of a clean environment for defect prevention without requiring the entire system to be overly complex, as only specific zones require stringent environmental control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If interchangeable processing heads are provided, then versatility of operations is improved, but bulk and volume of the machining head increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation typesVSAvoidmachining head volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The machining head is designed with dynamic interchangeability, allowing different processing heads to be mounted and removed as needed. Rather than incorporating all possible processing functions into a single large static head, the system uses a modular approach where compact individual heads can be quickly swapped. This dynamic configuration maintains versatility while minimizing the volume of the moving head at any given time, as only the required processing head is installed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Manufacturing precision

If real-time quality assurance monitoring is implemented, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality assuranceVSAvoidmonitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine tool incorporates real-time feedback monitoring systems that continuously track processing parameters, environmental conditions, and quality metrics during additive manufacturing operations. Sensors and detection devices provide immediate feedback on melt pool characteristics, material deposition quality, and environmental stability, allowing the control system to make real-time adjustments to maintain manufacturing precision without requiring overly complex post-processing inspection systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3152034B1Material processing methods and related apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.07.17 HYBRID MFG TECH LTD
  • EP3152034B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3152034B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3152034B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The application describes a machine tool adapted and arranged to carry out removal and addition of material on a work piece located in a work station, the machine having a first head arranged to remove material from the work piece and at least a second head arranged to process the work piece, each of the first and second heads being arranged to be moveable in at least two axes and preferably in 3, 4 or 5 axes and wherein the machine is arranged to control an environment of the work station. The work station is at least partially sealable. The machine has a clean side and a dirty side. Novel processing heads particularly adapted for use in the new machine tool are disclosed. These may also be retrofitted to CNC machines. The novel heads include heads adapted to carry out two processes simultaneously. Heads adapted to carry out heat and pressure treatment are also disclosed. Use of the processing heads to carry out analysis in manufacturing steps is disclosed as is the provision and use of heads that can carry out analysis as well as processing.