Hybrid Coordinate Measuring Machine Manual Programming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing coordinate measuring machines (CMMs) face limitations in programming efficiency, particularly for small series production, as manual machines are time-consuming and not suited for repetitive tasks, while motorized machines lack intuitive programming interfaces.

Innovation Solution

A CMM with a hybrid programming interface that allows manual and motorized control, using clutches to decouple actuators for manual displacement and encoders to record positions, enabling intuitive programming and force amplification for precise motor-assisted movements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a motorized measuring machine is used, then measurement productivity is improved, but programming complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement productivityVSAvoidprogramming complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between manual and motorized modes based on operational needs. The clutch mechanism enables the measuring head to be manually operated when programming is required, then automatically coupled to motorized actuation during measurement execution, providing adaptability between different operational states

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit acts as an intermediary that records manual positioning data during programming mode and automatically executes it during measurement mode. This intermediary system translates intuitive manual operations into precise motorized movements, bridging the gap between simplicity and automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If a manual measuring machine is used, then programming simplicity is improved, but measurement productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming simplicityVSAvoidmeasurement productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static manual operation to dynamic motorized execution. During programming, the operator manually positions the measuring head for intuitive coordinate entry, then the system automatically executes the recorded sequence at high speed, combining the ease of manual programming with the productivity of automated measurement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit creates a digital copy of the manual positioning sequence and reproduces it through motorized actuation. This copying process preserves the intuitive programming approach while executing it with the speed and precision of automated systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of operation

If clutches are used to decouple actuators for manual displacement, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manual controlVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drive system is segmented into independent actuators for each axis, with individual clutches allowing selective engagement. This segmentation enables manual operation of specific axes while maintaining motorized capability, providing operational flexibility without requiring complete system redesign

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution simplifies programming, combining the efficiency of motorized machines with the flexibility of manual machines, reducing programming time and improving precision by allowing intuitive, force-assisted motor control, thus enhancing the machine's ability to handle both unique and repetitive measurements.

Implementation Method 1

The clutch is designed so that, in active state, it transmits a friction torque to the element (170x, 170y, 170z)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

CMMs generally have encoders enabling the position of the measuring head at a given instant along each independent axis to be determined

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEncoder position detection:

Implementation Method 3

the elements (170x, 170y, 170z) are driven by three motors, also called actuators, (132x, 132y, 132z) controlled by the control unit (120)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion:

Data Source

PatentUS8516710B2Manually programmable motorized machine for measuring coordinates
Publication Date: 2013.08.27 TESA SA(CH)
  • US8516710B2 patent drawing
  • US8516710B2 patent drawing
  • US8516710B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Multidimensional coordinate measuring machine having a programming mode in which the measuring head can be displaced manually by an operator and a measuring mode in which a control unit is designed for automatically optimizing and reproducing the displacements of the measuring head recorded during the programming mode.