Hybrid Machine Learning Model for Physiological Predictions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current machine learning technologies face challenges in accurately predicting physiological data, such as heart rate and calories burned, for users during new or unseen workouts, especially when limited by computational resources and lack of user-specific training data.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid machine learning model combining a physiological model of heart rate and exercise demand with neural network embeddings is developed, which integrates differential equations to predict heart rate responses and incorporates weather and fatigue effects, allowing for predictions based on user-specific and demographic data, even without direct user activity data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional machine learning models are used for physiological predictions, then computational resources can be saved, but prediction accuracy for unseen workouts deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The model is segmented into two distinct components: a physiological model component that encodes domain knowledge about exercise physiology (oxygen demand, heart rate dynamics, fatigue, weather effects), and a neural network component that learns user-specific patterns from data. This segmentation allows each component to specialize, improving overall prediction accuracy while the physiological model provides a computationally efficient foundation that reduces the burden on the neural network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The model transforms physiological parameters (oxygen demand, fatigue level, weather conditions) into computational parameters that the neural network can process. By changing the representation of physiological states into embedded vectors, the model achieves both biological plausibility and computational efficiency, resolving the contradiction between accuracy and resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If user-specific training data is collected to improve prediction accuracy, then prediction precision improves, but the time required for data collection and model training increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction precisionVSAvoiddata collection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The physiological model is pre-configured with established exercise physiology principles and differential equations before any user data is collected. This preliminary setup provides immediate prediction capability based on domain knowledge, while user-specific training data is incrementally added to refine the model. The system is operational from the start without requiring extensive data collection periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The model continuously learns from user feedback and actual physiological measurements during workouts. As users perform activities and provide feedback (heart rate measurements, perceived exertion, actual calories burned), the neural network adjusts its parameters to better predict individual responses. This feedback loop progressively improves precision over time without requiring upfront data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If a comprehensive physiological model with multiple factors is used, then prediction reliability improves, but model complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The neural network acts as an intermediary layer between the physiological model and the prediction output. It translates complex physiological parameters (oxygen demand, fatigue, weather effects) into predictions of heart rate and calories burned. This intermediary structure allows the system to incorporate multiple physiological factors without directly exposing their complexity to the user or deployment environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The hybrid model framework is designed to be universal and can predict multiple physiological outcomes (heart rate, calories burned, oxygen consumption) using the same underlying physiological principles. The differential equations and neural network architecture serve multiple prediction functions simultaneously, reducing overall system complexity compared to having separate models for each prediction target.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240079112A1Physiological predictions using machine learning
Publication Date: 2024.03.07 APPLE INC
  • US20240079112A1 patent drawing
  • US20240079112A1 patent drawing
  • US20240079112A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The subject technology provides a framework for generating physiological predictions for a user of an electronic device. The physiological predictions may include user-specific predictions of a heartrate, a heartrate range, a number of steps, a number of calories, or other physiological conditions or aspects that may occur if the user engages in a future activity, such as a future workout. The physiological predictions may be generated by a machine learning model that incorporates a physiological state equation, and that generates, and utilizes, a user-specific embedding, along with user-agnostic parameters of the future activity, to make the predictions.